- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:12:25 -0500
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 10:03:30 UTC
Jean-Jacques, It isn't clear to me that we would want to have more than the framework itself in the arch doc as the WSAWG isn't supposed to be getting to tat level of detail. However, it might be possible to characterize it as an example that *could* be used... What do others think? Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com phone: +1 508 234 3624 "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr> Sent by: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org 12/19/2002 11:45 AM To www-ws-arch@w3.org cc Subject Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc Chris, Just looking again at your first draft. What about adding an abstract MEPs, namely request-response, described from the SOAP request-response MEP? Jean-Jacques.
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 10:03:30 UTC