www-html@w3.org from November 2002 by date

Friday, 29 November 2002

• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Liorean
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• RE: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Mark Stanton

Thursday, 28 November 2002

• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format David Woolley

Friday, 29 November 2002

• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Cyril

Thursday, 28 November 2002

• Re: ie6 and transitional dtd Dennis van der Kolk
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Liorean
• Re: [OT] HTML has, probably, confusing date format William F Hammond
• Re: [OT] HTML has, probably, confusing date format Philip TAYLOR [PC87S/O-XP]
• Re: [OT] HTML has, probably, confusing date format Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Cyril

Wednesday, 27 November 2002

• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Christoph Päper
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format. Soap. Cyril
• Re: Validator New Look Terje Bless
• RE: Validator New Look Terje Bless
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Cyril

Tuesday, 26 November 2002

• Re: Validator New Look C. Bottelier
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Validator New Look Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: Validator New Look Denis Boudreau [ CYBERcodeur.net ]
• RE: Validator New Look Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• RE: Validator New Look Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• Validator New Look Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] HTML has, probably, confusing date format Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: HTML has, probably, confusing date format David Woolley

Monday, 25 November 2002

• HTML has, probably, confusing date format Cyril
• Re: name / id attribute usage mccarthy36@earthlink.net
• Re: name / id attribute usage mccarthy36@earthlink.net
• Re: name / id attribute usage Boris Zbarsky
• Re: name / id attribute usage Jonas Jørgensen
• Re: name / id attribute usage mccarthy36@earthlink.net
• Re: name / id attribute usage mccarthy36@earthlink.net

Sunday, 24 November 2002

• Re: Element for Numbers Christoph Päper
• Re: Element for Numbers Christoph Päper
• Re: name / id attribute usage David Woolley
• Re: name / id attribute usage Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Element for Numbers Mikko Rantalainen
• name / id attribute usage mccarthy36@earthlink.net
• Re: Element for Numbers David Woolley
• Re: Element for Numbers David Woolley
• Sugerencia sobre el HTML/XHTML y los buscadores Mario Torres

Saturday, 23 November 2002

• Re: lowsrc attribute Karl Ove Hufthammer
• Re: lowsrc attribute Toby Inkster
• lowsrc attribute Joris Huizer

Friday, 22 November 2002

• Re: html2mif Roland Bluethgen
• html2mif A.AMAR
• Sugerencia sobre el HTML y los buscadores Mario Torres

Thursday, 21 November 2002

• Re: cdata, javascript and xhtml1.1 Boris Zbarsky
• cdata, javascript and xhtml1.1 Jonathan Chetwynd

Wednesday, 20 November 2002

• Re:Greek Forum-Cyprus Greek Forum

Thursday, 21 November 2002

• Re: Element for Numbers John Lewis

Wednesday, 20 November 2002

• Sugerencia sobre el HTML y los buscadores Mario Torres

Thursday, 21 November 2002

• RE: Element for Numbers Reinthaler, Frank

Wednesday, 20 November 2002

• Re: Element for Numbers Christoph Päper
• RE: Element for Numbers Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: Element for Numbers Christoph Päper
• Re: Element for Numbers Toby Inkster
• Re: Element for Numbers David Woolley

Tuesday, 19 November 2002

• Re: Element for Numbers Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: Element for Numbers Christoph Päper
• HTML 4.01 as an SGML application William F Hammond
• RE: Element for Numbers Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: Element for Numbers Christoph Päper
• RE: Element for Dates/Times (was Numbers) Rowland Shaw
• Re: Element for Numbers Christoph Päper
• Re: Element for Numbers Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: Element for Numbers Mikko Rantalainen
• RE: Element for Numbers Rowland Shaw
• Re: Element for Numbers David Woolley
• Element for Numbers Christoph Päper
• Prose description of the hr element Bjoern Hoehrmann

Monday, 18 November 2002

• Re: FIELDSET in IE versus Netscape Arthur Wiebe
• Re: sound on event Jonathan Chetwynd
• Re: sound on event Boris Zbarsky
• Re: sound on event Toby Inkster
• sound on event Jonathan Chetwynd

Sunday, 17 November 2002

• Markup for Code (was: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0) Christoph Päper
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Thomas Hurst
• Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. William F Hammond
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML D. Willems
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 fantasai

Thursday, 14 November 2002

• Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. Russell O'Connor

Saturday, 16 November 2002

• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Russell O'Connor

Sunday, 17 November 2002

• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Thomas Hurst
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 fantasai

Friday, 15 November 2002

• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Shawn K. Quinn

Saturday, 16 November 2002

• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML David Woolley
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Xatr0z
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Xatr0z
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Toby Inkster
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML David Woolley
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Toby Inkster
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Xatr0z
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Xatr0z
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML David Woolley
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Xatr0z
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Xatr0z
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML David Woolley
• RE: Idea for securityfix in HTML John Boyer
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML John Keiser

Friday, 15 November 2002

• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Boris Zbarsky
• <hr /> tag again! Toby Inkster
• Re: Idea for securityfix in HTML Toby Inkster
• Idea for securityfix in HTML Xatr0z

Wednesday, 13 November 2002

• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Etan Wexler

Thursday, 14 November 2002

• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Etan Wexler
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 David Woolley
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 John Lewis
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 fantasai

Wednesday, 13 November 2002

• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 John Lewis
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 fantasai
• Re: Layers Melody Chamlee
• Re: Layers Christian Ottosson
• Layers Victor I. Marcos
• Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. William F Hammond
• Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. Terje Bless
• Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 John Lewis

Tuesday, 12 November 2002

• Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. Terje Bless
• Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. Terje Bless
• RE: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Reinthaler, Frank
• Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. Nick Kew

Monday, 11 November 2002

• SGML SHORTTAGS Feature usage in HTML 4.x Recommendation. Terje Bless
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Lorenzo De Tomasi
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Thomas Hurst

Saturday, 9 November 2002

• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Liorean
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Sampo Syreeni
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Christoph Päper
• Re: Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 John Anthony Lewis

Wednesday, 6 November 2002

• Subheadings desired in XHTML 2.0 Etan Wexler

Friday, 8 November 2002

• Re: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text module) Ian Hickson

Thursday, 7 November 2002

• re: 'mailto:' and 'subject=' in lower case Tim Bagot
• re: 'mailto:' and 'subject=' in lower case Schneider, Jeff
• Re: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text module) Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text mo dule) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text module) Tantek Çelik
• Re: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text module) Boris Zbarsky
• RE: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text mo dule) Peter Foti (PeterF)
• Re: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text mod ule) Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text module) Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text module) Tantek Çelik
• Re: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text module) Bertilo Wennergren
• Aquatic Splashpads for your Playground Playscape Designs, Inc.
• RE: line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text mod ule) Peter Foti (PeterF)
• line breaks vs. line elements (comments on XHTML 2.0 text module) Peter Sheerin

Wednesday, 6 November 2002

• Re: XHTML 2.0 and <pre> element Liorean
• Re: submitting forms from one HTML document to another Jonas Jørgensen
• submitting forms from one HTML document to another Jenny Robins
• PLEEEEASE READ!!!!! It was on the news! Kenny Storgaard
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and <pre> element fantasai
• XHTML 2.0 and <pre> element Devon Y.

Tuesday, 5 November 2002

• Re: Standards & Accessibility compliancy in wysiwyg editors Jonny Axelsson
• Re: Does XHTML support Chinese character set Roland Bluethgen
• Re: Does XHTML support Chinese character set Bertilo Wennergren
• Does XHTML support Chinese character set YANG,JI-FENG (HP-China,ex2)

Monday, 4 November 2002

• Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Bertilo Wennergren
• Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Toby Inkster
• Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Christoph Päper
• Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Toby Inkster
• Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Christoph Päper
• Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word John Anthony Lewis
• RE: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Sampo Syreeni
• RE: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Jelks Cabaniss
• RE: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Denis Boudreau [ CYBERcodeur.net ]
• Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Toby Inkster
• RE: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design
• Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word Andrew McFarland
• Suggestion: change abbr to full word YANG,JI-FENG (HP-China,ex2)

Friday, 1 November 2002

• Re: Standards & Accessibility compliancy in wysiwyg editors Melody Chamlee

Sunday, 3 November 2002

• Re: Standards & Accessibility compliancy in wysiwyg editors William F Hammond
• Re: Standards & Accessibility compliancy in wysiwyg editors Mikko Rantalainen

Friday, 1 November 2002

• Re: Fw: Paged-media break points Johannes Koch
• Re: Paged-media break points Boris Zbarsky
• Fw: Paged-media break points Stephen Brooks
• Standards & Accessibility compliancy in wysiwyg editors Denis Boudreau [ CYBERcodeur.net ]
• RE: Paged-media break points Mike Darrin
• Re: Paged-media break points Johannes Koch
• Paged-media break points Stephen Brooks

Last message date: Friday, 29 November 2002 10:24:38 UTC