- From: Denis Boudreau [ CYBERcodeur.net ] <denis@cybercodeur.net>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 14:41:27 -0500
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
count me in the lazy group... i code by hand and i can't afford to waste time writing extra long tags while it could remain short. <hypertext-markup-language> and <paragraph> are especially scary. While we're on the subject, I've always wondered why <blockquote> was so long :) As for backwards-compatibility it has already been declared over with xhtml 2.0 I agree it has to happen at one point or another... but hopefully the changes will make our lives easier, not the other way around. -----Original Message----- From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Toby Inkster Sent: November 4, 2002 3:10 AM To: www-html@w3.org Subject: Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 15:21:37 +0800 "YANG,JI-FENG (HP-China,ex2)" <ji-feng.yang@hp.com> wrote: | A suggestion for the future of XHTML: change the tags from abbr to full | word. This kind of tags include p, q ,a, em, ul, dl, dt, ol and so on. | For example change "p" to "paragraph". Full word tags are aesthetically nicer (IMHO), but present some ractical problems. Firstly, a minor one -- they're bigger, so take longer to download. Secondly, and probably more importantly for most of us, they're more effort to type out. Consider: <html>...</html> - -vs- <hypertext-markup-language>...</hypertext-markup-language> Lastly, it breaks backwards-compatibility. Sure, occasionally backwards-compatibility needs to be broken -- keeping it for the sake of keeping it is a mistake -- but it is still a factor to be considered. A better solution is to try to make sure that all new tags are full words, but preferably short words -- like the proposed <line> tag. - -- Toby A Inkster BSc ARCS PGP: http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/node.cgi?id=12 Web Page: http://www.goddamn.co.uk/tobyink/ IM: AIM:inka80 ICQ:6622880 YIM:tobyink Jabber:tobyink@a-message.de Here we are in America ... when do we collect unemployment? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9xitqzr+BKGoqfTkRAm49AKCozK2UzDprecV0uhX8EOMjv0d9/gCfX+EI CGnspMWowhXdYehq3FI47Hc= =gh0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 14:41:44 UTC