- From: Nigel Peck - MIS Web Design <nigel@miswebdesign.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 09:48:25 -0000
- To: "Andrew McFarland" <andrew.mcfarland@unite.net>, <www-html@w3.org>
- Cc: "YANG,JI-FENG (HP-China,ex2)" <ji-feng.yang@hp.com>
The other thing about full word tags is download times, it would increase the file size a lot having full word tags for users with 56k modems. It would also completely screw up any backwards compatibility and make code harder to manage and longer to type. IMHO Nigel Peck Managing Director MIS Web Design Ltd. http://www.miswebdesign.com/ -----Original Message----- From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Andrew McFarland Sent: 04 November 2002 09:37 To: www-html@w3.org Cc: YANG,JI-FENG (HP-China,ex2) Subject: Re: Suggestion: change abbr to full word At 15:21 04/11/2002 +0800, YANG,JI-FENG (HP-China,ex2) wrote: >A suggestion for the future of XHTML: change the tags from abbr to full >word. This kind of tags include p, q ,a, em, ul, dl, dt, ol and so on. For >example change "p" to "paragraph". The Cool Thing about XHTML is the X - it's XML. Rather than change the p element type name to paragraph, which is much more prone to typos, it would probably be better to create your own markup language structurally identical to XHTML but with whatever element type names you want. You can then transform this to XHTML using a simple XSLT stylesheet. You could also do things like producing `French' HTML where the emphasis element type equivalent is called `emphase' and so on. Andrew
Received on Monday, 4 November 2002 05:00:09 UTC