- From: Christian Wolfgang Hujer <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:26:25 +0100
- To: cyril2@mail.ru, www-html@w3.org
Hi Cyril, Am Mittwoch, 27. November 2002 01:48 schrieb Cyril: > > And how am I supposed to *easily* compare Jan / Feb / Mar for sorting? > > The required hash is too much complication compared to the ease of > > current datetime comparison. > At a first glance, I had nearly agreed deciding that I had missed the > other side of the coin again. But then... If the goal is simplifying > sorting dates then there is more easy way of a date performing, by a 36 > bits integer of seconds from birthday of Christ till a datetime. E. g. > 31st of December in the year 2000 at 24:00:00 of old good GMT = 63 115 > 200 000 + 0 (binary: 1110 1011 0001 1111 0101 1000 0110 0000 0000). (I > don't know why but I don't want this format to be chosen. Do you?) That's definitely not neccessary. A date in a format like 2002-11-27 07:13:37 is already perfectly sortable with any ASCII or Unicode Scring comparison. It's sortably by plane date when you compare the complete string. No need to choose a non-human-readable format. This format is a good compromise. > > Anyway there are only two html elements using an attribute of type > > Datetime: <ins/> and <del/>. > Not only <ins> and <del> but also <meta ... /> > (http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#profiles ). And, thanks > to this format, the trend, the practice of presenting month information > by digits, may be widely deployed in the future what I consider as a > main defect of this date format. Not do I. I regard it's a feature. The flaw of HTML 4.01 at this point is that it referres to the 29 pages ISO8601 spec without giving a link. Go to www.iso.ch to find out that even the PDF version will cost you >100 CHF. That's a real flaw. > And as a final note, look at the domain addresses of this list. How have > a month information been presented there? That's mail and stuff, not HTML / XML. I definitely don't want to have to parse RFC dates! I hate them. Thanx god there are libraries to do that. But I do not develop mail apps, I develop html / xml apps. Anyway I think this discussion is pointless since I think (and hope) they won't change it. Bye -- ITCQIS GmbH Christian Wolfgang Hujer Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter Telefon: +49 (0)89 27 37 04 37 Telefax: +49 (0)89 27 37 04 39 E-Mail: Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com WWW: http://www.itcqis.com/
Received on Wednesday, 27 November 2002 01:26:58 UTC