- From: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@Math.Berkeley.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:05:49 -0800 (PST)
- To: W3C HTML Mailinglist <www-html@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [To: www-html@w3.org] On 13 Nov 2002, William F Hammond wrote: > I think this issue comes down to the question of whether HTML 4.01 is > an SGML application (and nothing more than that) or whether HTML 4.01 > is its *own thing* with which there is a canonically associated SGML > application[1]. Clearly HTML is an SGML application because according to section 4.2 of HTML 4.01 spec ``HTML 4 is an SGML application conforming to International Standard ISO 8879 -- Standard Generalized Markup Language SGML (defined in [ISO8879]).'' > The latter is correct. For example, one cannot make it a requirement > in an SGML application that there be a formal public identifier since > from the point of view of the strict SGML world an SGML document is > the full assemblage. I believe the above is also true. Clearly HTML is not an SGML application. Basically the HTML specification is inconsistent. I'm sure the W3C is aware of this. I'm not sure why it doesn't bother them. I know it keeps me awake at night. - -- Russell O'Connor <http://www.math.berkeley.edu/~roconnor/> ``[Law enforcement officials] suggested that the activists were stopped not because their names are on the list, but because their names resemble those of suspected criminals or terrorists.'' -- SFGate.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE91AIkuZUa0PWVyWQRAsguAJ9sZUu9iN+LRvK9o438BWKKPvv/twCfUyjx KnyRWDlKa8PTuyHTun9HcFU= =tcM+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 17 November 2002 03:23:50 UTC