www-font@w3.org from July to September 1996 by author

Andrew C. Bulhak

• Re: One font embedding idea (Tuesday, 13 August)
• Re: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Tuesday, 13 August)
• Re: digrams [Re: One font embedding idea] (Tuesday, 13 August)
• One font embedding idea (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: Java applets for font protection (was: pixel fonts) (Sunday, 11 August)
• Java applets for font protection (was: pixel fonts) (Saturday, 10 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)

Andrew Pennock

• RE: Protecting WebFonts (Thursday, 22 August)

Ben Polidore

• Re: Removel from list (Friday, 9 August)

Benjamin C. W. Sittler

• RE: the alternative? (Sunday, 1 September)

Bert Bos

• Announcement: Internationalization Symposium (Friday, 30 August)

Bill Benassi

• Mailing list (Wednesday, 7 August)

Bill Hill

• RE: Protecting WebFonts (Tuesday, 27 August)
• RE: the alternative? (Thursday, 22 August)
• RE: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Monday, 12 August)
• RE: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• RE: pixel fonts (Thursday, 8 August)

Bill McCoy

• RE: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: SuperATM and MM fonts instead of embedding (was Re: pixel fonts) (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: SuperATM and MM fonts instead of embedding (was Re: pixel fonts) (Sunday, 11 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Sunday, 11 August)

Brad Chase

• TrueDoc ( was Re[5]: Protecting WebFonts ) (Tuesday, 27 August)
• Re[5]: Protecting WebFonts (Tuesday, 27 August)
• Re[3]: Protecting WebFonts (Monday, 26 August)
• Re[2]: Protecting WebFonts (Monday, 26 August)
• Re[4]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• Re[4]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• Re[4]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)

Brian Sooy

• Re: SuperATM and MM fonts instead of embedding (was Re: pixel (Tuesday, 13 August)

Chris Lilley

• Re: the alternative? (Monday, 26 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Monday, 26 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Monday, 26 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Monday, 26 August)
• Re: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: pixel fonts (Thursday, 8 August)
• Re: Pixelfonts (Thursday, 8 August)

Chuck Coker

• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Wednesday, 14 August)

Clive Bruton

• Re: the alternative? (Monday, 26 August)
• Re: Re[3]: Protecting WebFonts (Monday, 26 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Monday, 26 August)
• RE: the alternative? (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Thursday, 22 August)
• RE: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Monday, 12 August)
• RE: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Monday, 12 August)
• RE: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: Re[4]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)

David Lemon

• RE: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Wednesday, 14 August)

David Siegel

• pixel fonts (Thursday, 8 August)

Erik van Blokland

• FontFont Specimen (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: the alternative? (Tuesday, 27 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Tuesday, 27 August)
• Re: Re[3]: Protecting WebFonts (Monday, 26 August)
• Re[4]: Protecting WebFonts (Monday, 26 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: pixel fonts (Tuesday, 9 July)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• RE: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: pixel fonts (Thursday, 8 August)
• Re: pixel fonts (Thursday, 8 August)
• Pixelfonts (Thursday, 8 August)

FONTBUREAU@aol.com

• RE: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Tuesday, 13 August)

Gary Ruben

• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Tuesday, 27 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Thursday, 22 August)
• Protecting WebFonts (Thursday, 22 August)

Gavin Nicol

• Re: Protecting web fonts (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: Java applets for font protection (was: pixel fonts) (Sunday, 11 August)
• Re: Java applets for font protection (was: pixel fonts) (Sunday, 11 August)
• Re: pixel fonts (Saturday, 10 August)
• Re: Re[4]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)

glen

• Re[4]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re[2]: pixel fonts (Thursday, 8 August)

James K. Tauber

• Re: pixel fonts (Saturday, 10 August)

Jay Rutherford

• Re: Protecting web fonts (Thursday, 22 August)

Jelle Bosma

• RE: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)

Jon Aagaard

• Remove from list (Friday, 9 August)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• Re: the alternative? (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Thursday, 22 August)

Kevin Hughes

• Re: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)

lee@sq.com

• Re: the alternative? (Tuesday, 27 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: One font embedding idea (Tuesday, 13 August)
• digrams [Re: One font embedding idea] (Tuesday, 13 August)
• Re: SuperATM and MM fonts instead of embedding (was Re: pixel fonts) (Sunday, 11 August)
• Re: Java applets for font protection (was: pixel fonts) (Saturday, 10 August)
• Re: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• RE: pixel fonts (Thursday, 8 August)

Martin J Duerst

• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Tuesday, 27 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Friday, 23 August)

Michael Bernstein

• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Tuesday, 27 August)
• Re[2]: Protecting WebFonts (Monday, 26 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Thursday, 22 August)
• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Thursday, 22 August)

Michal Young

• Re: the alternative? (Thursday, 22 August)

Rob Wood

• unsubcribe (Tuesday, 27 August)

Robert Stevahn

• Re: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)

S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk

• Re: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)

schristy@CSWNET.COM

• Removel from list (Thursday, 8 August)

Shaun Ellis

• Removal from list (Friday, 9 August)

Simon Daniels (Tech/Aid International Inc)

• RE: the alternative? (Friday, 23 August)
• the alternative? (Thursday, 22 August)

Simon Kenyon

• Nicely rendered text on the web - my way (was Re: Pixelfonts) (Monday, 12 August)

The Hoefler Type Foundry

• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Friday, 23 August)
• Re: digrams [Re: One font embedding idea] (Tuesday, 13 August)
• Re: One font embedding idea (Monday, 12 August)
• Adobe, Adobe, Adobe, Adobe, Adobe. (Monday, 12 August)
• Tag team font defense (Monday, 12 August)

Tim Rolands

• Re: Protecting WebFonts (Tuesday, 27 August)

Tiro TypeWorks

• Re: the alternative? (Monday, 26 August)
• Re: the alternative? (Friday, 23 August)
• RE: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• RE: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: SuperATM and MM fonts instead of embedding (was Re: pixel fonts) (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Monday, 12 August)
• RE: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Monday, 12 August)
• RE: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Monday, 12 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Sunday, 11 August)
• Re: SuperATM and MM fonts instead of embedding (was Re: pixel fonts) (Sunday, 11 August)
• Proposal: Font Use Modelling (Friday, 9 August)
• Font protection schemes (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)
• Re: Re[2]: pixel fonts (Friday, 9 August)

Todd

• Re: the alternative? (Saturday, 24 August)

Tom Rickner

• Why just give away fonts? Why not apps? (Monday, 12 August)

Walter Ian Kaye

• Re[4]: Protecting WebFonts (Saturday, 28 August)
• Re: Protecting web fonts (Tuesday, 24 August)
• SuperATM and MM fonts instead of embedding (was Re: pixel fonts) (Wednesday, 11 August)

Last message date: Thursday, 5 September 1996 13:08:18 UTC