- From: Tiro TypeWorks <tiro@portal.ca>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 11:59:37 -0700
- To: www-font@w3.org
Clive Bruton wrote: >>On Aug 9, 3:23pm, Tiro TypeWorks wrote: >>> I propose (and I'll let everyone else decide who is best placed to implement >>> such a proposal) that time should be taken to build a series of models of >>> current font usage, detailing how fonts are purchased and used by different >>> market groups, how fonts are likely to be used by such groups in the future, >Chris Lilley: >>And by other groups. It is the community who do not currently use fonts now but >>wish to in the future that is the growth area. >Maybe something of what John (Tiro) meant was not picked up, or perhaps I'm just >bringing my viewpoint to it, there is a fundamental difference between people >who use type to view documents (currently everyone who can read) and those that >use type to author documents. >From my perspective I'd like to see that differentiation maintained, fonts for >viewing and fonts for authoring should be two different things, and the former >should not be able to be converted into the latter. Yes, that is indeed part of what I meant, though I didn't put it nearly so eloquently (or concisely). John Hudson, Type Director Tiro TypeWorks Vancouver, BC tiro@portal.ca http://www.portal.ca/~tiro
Received on Monday, 12 August 1996 14:54:28 UTC