uri@w3.org from October 2004 by subject

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines- 00.txt]

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hansen-2717bis-2718bis-uri-guidelines-00.txt]

Are recipients required to resolve fragment identifiers?

Are we done with draft-hoffman-ftp-uri-02.txt?




Dropping 'gopher', 'wais', 'prospero'

editorial suggestions for RFC 2396 bis

file: URI scheme

Fwd: [Moderator Action] Re: Dropping 'gopher', 'wais', 'prospero'

Protocol Action: 'Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax' to Full Standard

rfc2396bis editorial suggestion

rfc2396bis editorial suggestion: file system vs filesystem

Status of the RFC 1738 replacements

TAG scheme - some comments

Thank you, Roy [was: Re: FW: Protocol Action: 'Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): ...]

The news and nntp URI Schemes

URI guidelines revisions

URNs and fragments (was: URN as namespace URI for RDF Schema)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 October 2004 23:24:12 UTC