- From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:17:52 -0700
- To: uri@w3.org
At 4:49 PM +0200 10/29/04, Frank Ellermann wrote: >2396bis is already in <http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html>: ><ftp://ftp.isi.edu/internet-drafts/draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis-07.txt> Yes, but we don't know its RFC number, and we won't for some time. The RFC Editor takes care of updating these things when they process the documents. >There's still that "URIs are were" typo in the Intro. Got it, thanks. >Maybe add "but binary should be a safe guess" in 2.4. Why? It has nothing to do with the URI scheme, only with the FTP protocol itself. --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium
Received on Friday, 29 October 2004 16:17:55 UTC