- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:22:38 +0100
- To: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>, uri@w3.org
Paul,
Responding to your call for review, I took a look and generally I think it
looks fine, but I do have a couple of comments/questions:
...
1. Introduction, and elsewhere:
I assume this reference:
draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis [2396bis]
will be updated as this goes forward for publication?
...
2. Scheme Definition:
[[
A FTP URL follows the standard syntax described in
draft-fielding-uri-rfc2396bis [2396bis]. If :<port> is omitted, the
port defaults to 21.
]]
That's the command channel port, right? Does the FTP URI spec have
anything to say about the data channel port? I guess not.
...
2.2 FTP url-path:
[[
Historical note: Most FTP client implementations precede the <cwd1>
with a "/" before sending the CWD command. This is arguably in
conflict with RFC 1738, although the practice is quite widespread.
Thus, a client that is presented with the URL
<URL:ftp://myname@example.com/abc/def> might send the two commands
"CWD /abc" and "RETR def" or it might send the two commands "CWD abc"
and "RETR def". Server implementers should be aware of these two
different interpretations of the same URL.
]]
That looks like a potential security problem to me... shouldn't FTP servers
avoid allowing accesses outside the indicated user's area (subtree)?
I don't recall the details of how FTP works here, but is this topic worth a
note under security considerations?
...
#g
At 18:19 28/10/04 -0700, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
>In a previous message, I said:
>
>>I updated the "ftp" draft to reflect the discussion on the list; it is
>>now available as draft-hoffman-ftp-uri-02.txt. I think I got it right,
>>but having folks review it would be great. Is it done, or did I mess up,
>>or did I get it right but it could use more explanation?
>> . . .
>> Title : The ftp URI Scheme
>> Author(s) : P. Hoffman
>> Filename : draft-hoffman-ftp-uri-02.txt
>> Pages : 5
>> Date : 2004-10-21
>>
>>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-ftp-uri-02.txt
>
>It would be grand to hear if anyone has any further refinements that they
>want made to this draft in the next few weeks.
>
>--Paul Hoffman, Director
>--Internet Mail Consortium
------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Friday, 29 October 2004 15:54:21 UTC