- From: Alun Jones <alunj@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:15:04 -0700
- To: "Paul Hoffman / IMC" <phoffman@imc.org>, <uri@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: uri-request@w3.org [mailto:uri-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Paul Hoffman / IMC > > To which Alun replied: > > >No. If the user isn't allowed outside of his subtree, the > user will not > >be allowed outside of his subtree. He will receive access errors, or > >more likely, will already be prevented from going outside > his subtree. > >Usually this is accomplished by hiding anything outside of the home > >directory, and treating all absolute path names as paths > relative to the > >home directory. > > Actually, I think Alun meant to start with "Yes", as in, "the servers > should avoid that". And they do (at least every single one I have > used does). This has nothing to do with the URI scheme. The rest of > what Alun says matches my experience. No, you are absolutely correct. :) Alun. ~~~~~
Received on Friday, 29 October 2004 18:16:34 UTC