public-wsc-wg@w3.org from February 2007 by date

Tuesday, 27 February 2007

• Introduction time Jan Vidar Krey

Monday, 26 February 2007

• Tomorrow's call cancelled Mary Ellen Zurko

Friday, 23 February 2007

• No agenda today Mary Ellen Zurko
• RE: Action-146: Starting up a new thread on "future proofing" WSC's recommendations michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• RE: Clarifying "reputation service" in section 7.7 of the Note michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com

Thursday, 22 February 2007

• ISSUE-12: User-agents - future proofing Web Security Context Issue Tracker
• RE: Gateways Doyle, Bill
• Gateways Mary Ellen Zurko
• Once more, on the process on comments to the Note Mary Ellen Zurko
• ISSUE-11: \"Problems with the status quo\" Web Security Context Issue Tracker
• Open issues Thomas Roessler
• Minutes: WSC WG weekly 2007-02-13 Thomas Roessler

Wednesday, 21 February 2007

• RE: Action-146: Starting up a new thread on "future proofing" WSC's recommendations Mary Ellen Zurko
• Introduction: Johnathan Nightingale (mozilla) Johnathan Nightingale
• RE: Action-146: Starting up a new thread on "future proofing" WSC's recommendations Timothy Hahn
• RE: Action-146: Starting up a new thread on "future proofing" WSC's recommendations Doyle, Bill
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• RE: Action-146: Starting up a new thread on "future proofing" WSC's recommendations Doyle, Bill

Tuesday, 20 February 2007

• reviewing the Note Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: "Chrome" Mike Beltzner
• Re: Action-146: Starting up a new thread on "future proofing" WSC's recommendations Brad Porter
• Action-146: Starting up a new thread on "future proofing" WSC's recommendations Chuck Wade
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• Re: "Chrome" Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
• Re: "Chrome" Mary Ellen Zurko
• RE: Clarifying "reputation service" in section 7.7 of the Note Mary Ellen Zurko
• RE: ACTION-145: New Abstract Doyle, Bill
• Re: ACTION-145: New Abstract Timothy Hahn
• ACTION-145: New Abstract Thomas Roessler
• RE: Agenda, 20 Feb, WSC Call Doyle, Bill

Monday, 19 February 2007

• Please register your intentions around our May f2f in Dublin asap Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: checkpoint on Note text for FPWD discussion Tuesday Thomas Roessler

Saturday, 17 February 2007

• RE: ISSUE-10: The Web, The Universe, and Everything Close, Tyler J.

Friday, 16 February 2007

• Agenda, 20 Feb, WSC Call Mary Ellen Zurko
• ISSUE-10: The Web, The Universe, and Everything Thomas Roessler
• Re: checkpoint on Note text for FPWD discussion Tuesday Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: checkpoint on Note text for FPWD discussion Tuesday Thomas Roessler

Thursday, 15 February 2007

• ACTION-84 Produce material on name-based virtual hosting and TLS Mary Ellen Zurko
• ACTION-80Redraft phonelure use case Mary Ellen Zurko
• Updated Access Control Working Draft Brad Porter
• references on technology uptake by users, based on perceived benefits Mary Ellen Zurko
• checkpoint on Note text for FPWD discussion Tuesday Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ACTION-125: use case rework Thomas Roessler
• Minutes: WSC weekly 2007-02-06 Thomas Roessler
• Minutes: WSC face-to-face 2007-01-31 Thomas Roessler
• Minutes: WSC face-to-face 2007-01-30 Thomas Roessler

Wednesday, 14 February 2007

• Re: ACTION-144 Drop public sample code promise from 10.3 and send text to list & tyler Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: "Web Security Context" live live live Thomas Roessler
• Re: ACTION-144 Drop public sample code promise from 10.3 and send text to list & tyler Mike Beltzner
• RE: "Web Security Context" die die die Close, Tyler J.

Tuesday, 13 February 2007

• RE: "Web Security Context" live live live michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• Re: "Web Security Context" die die die Stephen Farrell
• Re: "Web Security Context" die die die Mike Beltzner
• "Web Security Context" die die die Close, Tyler J.
• RE: ACTION-144 Drop public sample code promise from 10.3 and send text to list & tyler Close, Tyler J.
• Re: Merits of the status quo Mike Beltzner
• RE: Merits of the status quo Close, Tyler J.
• RE: ACTION-102: Switch order of 8.2.3 and 8.2.4 Close, Tyler J.
• ACTION-144 Drop public sample code promise from 10.3 and send text to list & tyler Mary Ellen Zurko
• Action item summary: 2007-02-13 Thomas Roessler
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• Re: What we're trying to protect... Thomas Roessler
• Re: "Chrome" Thomas Roessler
• Re: Draft text for section 9.3 of Note - Implementation and Testing - ACTION-121 Thomas Roessler
• Re: Merits of the status quo Mike Beltzner
• Re: Action-85: Wildcard certs and virtual hosts Mike Beltzner
• Re: "Chrome" Mike Beltzner
• Better HTTP authentication scheme that's phish-proof? Mike Beltzner
• Re: "Chrome" George Staikos
• Re: ACTION-102: Switch order of 8.2.3 and 8.2.4 Mike Beltzner
• Action-85: Wildcard certs and virtual hosts Chuck Wade
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• Merits of the status quo Close, Tyler J.
• ACTION-104: Extend 8.2.1 by tab title Close, Tyler J.
• ACTION-119: add "consistency" to Design Principles section Close, Tyler J.
• ACTION-102: Switch order of 8.2.3 and 8.2.4 Close, Tyler J.
• RE: Clarifying "reputation service" in section 7.7 of the Note Close, Tyler J.
• RE: ACTION-118: Reword of first two design priniciples Close, Tyler J.
• RE: What we're trying to protect... michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com

Monday, 12 February 2007

• RE: ACTION-125: use case rework Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: "Chrome" Mike Beltzner
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• Re: What we're trying to protect... Brad Porter
• RE: "Chrome" michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• RE: What we're trying to protect... michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• An instructive non-phish Hal Lockhart
• RE: ACTION-120: further text on "explanations" bullet Close, Tyler J.
• RE: ISSUE-8: User Education Close, Tyler J.
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• RE: Draft text for section 9.3 of Note - Implementation and Testing - ACTION-121 Close, Tyler J.
• RE: ACTION-100, ACTION-101: Propose alternative wording for 8.2.3 Close, Tyler J.
• Re: "Chrome" Chuck Wade
• RE: ISSUE-10: Scope sections: \"Web\" in sections 4.1 and 5.1; \"entity identification\" in 4.3 Close, Tyler J.
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• Re: "Chrome" Chuck Wade
• Re: Clarifying "reputation service" in section 7.7 of the Note michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• Re: What we're trying to protect... Stephen Farrell
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• Re: What we're trying to protect... Brad Porter
• RE: "Chrome" Hal Lockhart
• Re: What we're trying to protect... Stephen Farrell
• What we're trying to protect... Brad Porter
• Re: "Chrome" Brad Porter
• Re: "Chrome" Mike Beltzner
• Re: ACTION-83 HTTPS Client checking of Server Identity Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: "Chrome" Bob Pinheiro
• Re: ACTION-27 Is complete, take a look at NoteWorkshopRecommendations Mary Ellen Zurko
• "Chrome" Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ACTION-118: Reword of first two design priniciples Maritza Johnson
• Re: ACTION-120: further text on "explanations" bullet Maritza Johnson

Sunday, 11 February 2007

• RE: One laptop per child project security model. Dan Schutzer

Saturday, 10 February 2007

• RE: Action items from February 6 WSC WG call Close, Tyler J.
• RE: Action items from February 6 WSC WG call Close, Tyler J.
• RE: Action items from February 6 WSC WG call Close, Tyler J.
• RE: Action items from February 6 WSC WG call Close, Tyler J.

Friday, 9 February 2007

• Re: ACTION-87: Certificate errors and warnings displayed by Opera Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)
• Re: ACTION-87: Certificate errors and warnings displayed by Opera Thomas Roessler
• Re: ISSUE-9: The Note needs a decent title and a shortname. Thomas Roessler
• Agenda, 13 Feb, WSC Call Mary Ellen Zurko
• RE: ACTION-125: use case rework michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• RE: ACTION-125: use case rework Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: One laptop per child project security model. Mike Beltzner
• Meeting Hosting Requirements (ACTION-123) Thomas Roessler
• RE: ACTION-125: use case rework michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• RE: ACTION=78 - refine usernotions use cases michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• RE: One laptop per child project security model. michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
• ACTION-87: Certificate errors and warnings displayed by Opera Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA)

Thursday, 8 February 2007

• ACTION=78 - refine usernotions use cases Mary Ellen Zurko
• ACTION-60 - a subsectin on browsers/UAs covered Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ACTION-125: use case rework Thomas Roessler
• Re: ISSUE-9: The Note needs a decent title and a shortname. Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: ACTION-125: use case rework Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: Fw: Proposed revised schedule Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: Where's the proposed overview text? Thomas Roessler
• Where's the proposed overview text? Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: Fw: Proposed revised schedule Thomas Roessler
• Re: ISSUE-8: User Education Mary Ellen Zurko
• ACTION-83 HTTPS Client checking of Server Identity Hal Lockhart
• ACTION-27 Is complete, take a look at NoteWorkshopRecommendations Hal Lockhart
• One laptop per child project security model. Doyle, Bill
• Fw: Proposed revised schedule Mary Ellen Zurko

Wednesday, 7 February 2007

• Global 'blogathon' to mark Safer Internet Day - Feb 6 Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: Draft text for section 9.3 of Note - Implementation and Testing - ACTION-121 Thomas Roessler
• Draft text for section 9.3 of Note - Implementation and Testing - ACTION-121 Mary Ellen Zurko
• side conversations on test development Mary Ellen Zurko
• ACTION-100, ACTION-101: Propose alternative wording for 8.2.3 Thomas Roessler
• ACTION-112: Rewrite for 8.3.2 (was ACTION-100) Thomas Roessler
• ACTION-100: Rewrite for 8.3.2 Thomas Roessler
• ISSUE-10: Scope sections: \"Web\" in sections 4.1 and 5.1; \"entity identification\" in 4.3 Web Security Context Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-9: The Note needs a decent title and a shortname. Web Security Context Issue Tracker
• ACTION-125: use case rework Thomas Roessler

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

• Minutes: WSC WG weekly 2007-01-23 Thomas Roessler
• Action items from February 6 WSC WG call Thomas Roessler
• face-to-face materials posted Thomas Roessler
• Re: Summary of 30 January action items Thomas Roessler
• Re: Summary of 30 January action items Thomas Roessler

Monday, 5 February 2007

• Schneier: In Touch With Security's Sensitive Side Mary Ellen Zurko
• RE: Study Finds Security Flaws on Web Sites of Major Banks - New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/05/technology/05secure.html?_r=1&th=&oref=s login&emc=th&pagewanted=print) Close, Tyler J.
• Re: ACTION-81 - FollowingALink Thomas Roessler
• Re: ACTION-81 - FollowingALink Mary Ellen Zurko
• RE: ISSUE-8: User Education Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: Study Finds Security Flaws on Web Sites of Major Banks - New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/05/technology/05secure.html?_r=1&th=&oref=s login&emc=th&pagewanted=print) Stuart E. Schechter
• Fw: Study Finds Security Flaws on Web Sites of Major Banks - New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/05/technology/05secure.html?_r=1&th=&oref=slogin&emc=th&pagewanted=print) Mary Ellen Zurko
• Action items from January 31, cont' Thomas Roessler
• Summary of 31 January action items Thomas Roessler
• Summary of 30 January action items Thomas Roessler
• Summary of 23 January action items Thomas Roessler
• Clarifying "reputation service" in section 7.7 of the Note Close, Tyler J.
• Re: Agenda, 06 Feb, WSC Call Thomas Roessler
• Agenda, 06 Feb, WSC Call Mary Ellen Zurko

Friday, 2 February 2007

• ACTION-81 Close, Tyler J.
• RE: ISSUE-8: User Education Close, Tyler J.
• RE: ACTION-27 - aligning Note with Workshop Hal Lockhart

Thursday, 1 February 2007

• Differential Use Case and ACTION-69 Mary Ellen Zurko
• ACTION-60 - Browser/UA section of Note Mary Ellen Zurko
• ACTION-27 - aligning Note with Workshop Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: Interesting paper re EV certs and UIs Mary Ellen Zurko

Last message date: Tuesday, 27 February 2007 21:20:23 UTC