Re: ACTION-27 Is complete, take a look at NoteWorkshopRecommendations

Thanks Hal. 

I'm just starting to read these, and I'm struck once again by the 
personalization conundrum. Patrick et al give a number of design 
techniques that will drive trust, including offering a personlized 
service. Yet Schecter et al. report a very small percentage of users will 
distrust based on the lack of such an indicator. Dhamija et al (and 
others) point out that users don't notice the lack of something. To the 
extent the security indicator is in "non chrome", the lack cannot be 
promoted to an explicit lack indicator. But if it is reported in "chrome", 
then the "lack" can look like something. The only way to promote site 
personalization to "chrome" without a protocol change is to do with the 
browser/UA; not the site itself 

          Mez

Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office       (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect




"Hal Lockhart" <hlockhar@bea.com> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
02/08/2007 02:43 PM

To
<public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
cc

Subject
ACTION-27 Is complete, take a look at NoteWorkshopRecommendations







As I said previously, I created a new page under More document structure
called NoteWorkshopRecommendations.

It has three subsections: RawRecommendations, InScopeandOutofScope and
InScopebyCategory.

This closes ACTION-27.

Hal