- From: Close, Tyler J. <tyler.close@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:52:58 -0000
- To: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Done, see: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/drafts/note/Overview.html#favicon Tyler > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Beltzner [mailto:beltzner@mozilla.com] > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 8:28 PM > To: Close, Tyler J. > Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: ACTION-102: Switch order of 8.2.3 and 8.2.4 > > On 12-Feb-07, at 8:27 PM, Close, Tyler J. wrote: > > > Currently, section 8.2.3 is about favicon and 8.2.4 is about the > > padlock. The padlock text makes reference to the favicon. > The favicon > > text does not make reference to the padlock. The current > ordering of > > favicon before padlock therefore seems best to me. Can > anyone remember > > why we wanted to switch the order? The minutes from the Jan 30 f2f > > meeting don't reveal the reason. > > I believe that was me, and the rationale was that the issue raised in > 8.2.4 (now 9.2.5) isn't actually a problem with the padlock > icon, but rather a problem with the display of favicons. So I > was suggesting that we reverse the order, introduce the idea > of the padlock icon, and then in the explanation of favicons > describe how favicons can be used to mimick the padlock icon. > > cheers, > mike > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 18:53:45 UTC