- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:16:08 -0500
- To: "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 20:16:38 UTC
Bill, I'm confused. I think of a user agent as having a user, and I dont' think of a geteway as having a user. What am I missing? Mez Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389) Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org> 02/22/2007 10:25 AM To "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com> cc <member-wsc-wg@w3.org> Subject RE: Comment list for FPWD Thomas 4.2 User agents Didn't see this covered. I feel that user agents may be gateways or interact with gateways to/from http(s) and other secure protocols. A quick sentence to note that security context is expected to secure the entire session regardless if the session is being handed off to the user agent or initiated by the user agent. Bill D.
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 20:16:38 UTC