- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:16:08 -0500
- To: "Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 20:16:38 UTC
Bill, I'm confused. I think of a user agent as having a user, and I dont'
think of a geteway as having a user. What am I missing?
Mez
Mary Ellen Zurko, STSM, IBM Lotus CTO Office (t/l 333-6389)
Lotus/WPLC Security Strategy and Patent Innovation Architect
"Doyle, Bill" <wdoyle@mitre.org>
02/22/2007 10:25 AM
To
"Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Mary Ellen Zurko"
<Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
cc
<member-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Subject
RE: Comment list for FPWD
Thomas
4.2 User agents
Didn't see this covered.
I feel that user agents may be gateways or interact with gateways
to/from http(s) and other secure protocols. A quick sentence to note
that security context is expected to secure the entire session
regardless if the session is being handed off to the user agent or
initiated by the user agent.
Bill D.
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 20:16:38 UTC