Re: checkpoint on Note text for FPWD discussion Tuesday

On 2007-02-16 08:44:07 -0500, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:

>> I'm therefore suggesting that we let the publication schedule
>> slip once more, since ISSUE-10 has the ability to provoke
>> questions that might take us a bunch of time to respond to, so
>> I do consider that issue to be on the critical path for
>> publication. Sorry.

> Slip the schedule to what?

Whatever time is needed to get the change into the draft, and get
people to review it and agree on it.  Since that has happened now,
we might even be able to stick to our earlier plan.

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 09:51:32 UTC