public-wsc-wg@w3.org from August 2007 by author

Anil Saldhana

• Re: Summary of "What is a secure page?" discussion, first draft (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: meeting Aug 8th regrets (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: ACTION-275 (Friday, 3 August)

Audian Paxson

• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Monday, 27 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Monday, 27 August)
• RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-08-22 (Tuesday, 21 August)
• ACTION-278 (Monday, 13 August)
• RE: first cut usability walk through (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Friday, 10 August)
• Survey tool (Thursday, 9 August)

Bob Pinheiro

• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)

Close, Tyler J.

• RE: Different protections for different kinds of spoofing (Was: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component) (Friday, 31 August)
• RE: Measuring and optimizing user effort (Was: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component) (Friday, 31 August)
• The purpose of Note use-cases (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Different protections for different kinds of spoofing (Was: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component) (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Non-form-filler users (Was: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component) (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Measuring and optimizing user effort (Was: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component) (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Tuesday, 28 August)
• straw poll: Is page info summary a non-Goal? (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Some numbers for our use-case scenarios (Monday, 13 August)
• RE: ISSUE-92: P3P and Internet filters (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: ISSUE-38: no safe haven in presentation space (from publiccomments) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• RE: ISSUE-73: Proposed changes to process chapter (Wednesday, 8 August)
• RE: Trusted Browser Component (Re: Action 213: write a lightningproposal on wiki) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• RE: ISSUE-76: add file extension remark to security context information list (Wednesday, 8 August)
• RE: first cut usability walk through (Monday, 6 August)
• RE: ISSUE-95: bookmark API interactions (Thursday, 2 August)

Dan Schutzer

• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 31 August)
• RE: FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional limitations) (Friday, 31 August)
• RE: FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional limitations) (Thursday, 30 August)
• RE: FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional limitations) (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: The purpose of Note use-cases (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Wednesday, 29 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Tuesday, 28 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: straw poll: Is page info summary a non-Goal? (Tuesday, 21 August)
• FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional limitations) (Monday, 20 August)
• RE: New use case for malware at previously visited site (Thursday, 16 August)
• RE: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates? [Techniques] (Sunday, 12 August)
• RE: first cut usability walk through (Sunday, 12 August)
• RE: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Thursday, 9 August)
• RE: New use case for malware at previously visited site (Thursday, 2 August)

Doyle, Bill

• RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-08-15 (Wednesday, 15 August)
• meeting Aug 8th regrets (Saturday, 4 August)
• RE: ISSUE-77: Reference threat work in wsc-usecases (Wednesday, 1 August)

Ian Fette

• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Non-form-filler users (Was: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Different protections for different kinds of spoofing (Was: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Measuring and optimizing user effort (Was: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: The purpose of Note use-cases (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New use case for malware at previously visited site (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: ISSUE-98: Which kind of logotype should be preferred? [Techniques] (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: favicons: updated editor's draft [ACTION-276] (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: favicons: updated editor's draft [ACTION-276] (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: ISSUE-100: Update acknowledgementst to list everyone who contributed [Note: use cases etc.] (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: ACTION-275 (Friday, 3 August)
• ACTION-275 (Friday, 3 August)
• New use case for malware at previously visited site (Wednesday, 1 August)

Jan Vidar Krey

• Re: ISSUE-6 / ACTION-239: Mobile/device browsing (Monday, 13 August)

Johnathan Nightingale

• Re: straw poll: Is page info summary a non-Goal? (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: ISSUE-105: What information should be communicated about client state? [Techniques] (Monday, 20 August)
• Re: ISSUE-100: Update acknowledgementst to list everyone who contributed [Note: use cases etc.] (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: summary from brainstorming session in Dublin (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: "industry standards" (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: "industry standards" (Wednesday, 8 August)

Luis Barriga (KI/EAB)

• RE: New use case for malware at previously visited site (Thursday, 16 August)

Maritza Johnson

• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-08-08 (Tuesday, 7 August)
• draft minutes from 8/01 call (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: first cut usability walk through (Wednesday, 1 August)

Mary Ellen Zurko

• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Tuesday, 28 August)
• Re: Current state of editor's draft / IdentitySignal (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Interest in "code sprint" at one of our f2fs? (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• ISSUE-101: Create "visiting known site that is now malware" use case as per ACTION-275 [Note: use cases etc.] (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: ISSUE-92: P3P and Internet filters (Friday, 24 August)
• FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional limitations) (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: straw poll: Is page info summary a non-Goal? (Wednesday, 22 August)
• RE: straw poll: Is page info summary a non-Goal? (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-08-22 (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-08-15 (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: first cut usability walk through (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: first cut usability walk through (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: ISSUE-77: Reference threat work in wsc-usecases (Friday, 10 August)
• WSC Open Action Items (Friday, 10 August)
• Proactive apoligies if I falsely nag you this week (Friday, 10 August)
• ACTION-221 Match RobustSecurityIndicators against other proposals; ensure nothing gets lost (Friday, 10 August)
• Robustness through a shared secret (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: ISSUE-100: Update acknowledgementst to list everyone who contributed [Note: use cases etc.] (Friday, 10 August)
• Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-08-08 (Tuesday, 7 August)
• Re: ISSUE-73: Proposed changes to process chapter (Friday, 3 August)
• WSC Open Action Items (Friday, 3 August)
• marking template sections as optional for robustness only proposals (Friday, 3 August)
• Robustness proposal - Overriding SCI presentation (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: ISSUE-77: Reference threat work in wsc-usecases (Wednesday, 1 August)

michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com

• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Thursday, 30 August)
• RE: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Thursday, 30 August)
• RE: Next face-to-face: October 2/3 Austin Texas (Tuesday, 21 August)
• RE: straw poll: Is page info summary a non-Goal? (Tuesday, 21 August)
• RE: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates?[Techniques] (Tuesday, 14 August)
• RE: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EVcertificates?[Techniques] (Monday, 13 August)
• RE: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates?[Techniques] (Monday, 13 August)
• RE: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates? [Techniques] (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: ISSUE-98: Which kind of logotype should be preferred? [Techniques] (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: favicons: updated editor's draft [ACTION-276] (Friday, 10 August)
• RE: favicons: updated editor's draft [ACTION-276] (Friday, 10 August)

Mike Beltzner

• Re: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates?[Techniques] (Tuesday, 14 August)
• ACTION-256 completed (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: favicons: updated editor's draft [ACTION-276] (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: ISSUE-100: Update acknowledgementst to list everyone who contributed [Note: use cases etc.] (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: favicons: updated editor's draft [ACTION-276] (Wednesday, 8 August)

Rachna Dhamija

• first cut usability walk through (Wednesday, 1 August)

Serge Egelman

• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: straw poll: Is page info summary a non-Goal? (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates?[Techniques] (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: first cut usability walk through (Friday, 10 August)
• Re: first cut usability walk through (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: ACTION-252 OPEN Map out some study proposals for existing recommendations, co-ordinate with Rachna who owns u (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: first cut usability walk through (Wednesday, 1 August)

Shawn Duffy

• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-08-15 (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Resurfacing and regrets (Wednesday, 8 August)

Stephen Farrell

• Re: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates?[Techniques] (Monday, 13 August)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional limitations) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Non-form-filler users (Was: PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component) (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: ISSUE-103: Should unknown CAs and self-signed certificates be treated the same way? [Techniques] (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional limitations) (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: The purpose of Note use-cases (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Re: Security Considerations (Re: Current state of editor's draft / IdentitySignal) (Wednesday, 29 August)
• [fwd] TLS protected draft (from: yngve@opera.com) (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Security Considerations (Re: Current state of editor's draft / IdentitySignal) (Saturday, 25 August)
• Deployment practices (Re: Current state of editor's draft / IdentitySignal) (Saturday, 25 August)
• Identity Signals: Nicknames and certificate attributes (Re: Current state of editor's draft / IdentitySignal) (Saturday, 25 August)
• Certificate status checks vs validity period; self-signed certs (Re: Current state of editor's draft / IdentitySignal) (Saturday, 25 August)
• Old SSL (Re: Current state of editor's draft / IdentitySignal) (Saturday, 25 August)
• Web Page vs Rich Client (Re: Current state of editor's draft / IdentitySignal) (Saturday, 25 August)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2007-08-29 (Friday, 24 August)
• Agenda: WSC WG weekly 2007-08-29 (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Interest in "code sprint" at one of our f2fs? (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Interest in "code sprint" at one of our f2fs? (Friday, 24 August)
• Re: Next face-to-face: October 2/3 Austin Texas (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: straw poll: Is page info summary a non-Goal? (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Updated editor's draft: PageInfoSummary (ACTION-281) (Sunday, 19 August)
• PII Editor Bar & Trusted Browser Component (Thursday, 16 August)
• Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2007-08-08 (Thursday, 16 August)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-08-15 (Tuesday, 14 August)
• Re: Proposal: error handling / minimizing trust decisions (Monday, 13 August)
• reference for myspace worm? (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates?[Techniques] (Monday, 13 August)
• Re: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates?[Techniques] (Monday, 13 August)
• Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2007-08-01 (Monday, 13 August)
• Proposal: error handling / minimizing trust decisions (Sunday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates? [Techniques] (Sunday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE-78: Definitions (Sunday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE-92: P3P and Internet filters (Sunday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: "industry standards" (Thursday, 9 August)
• updated editor's draft: IdentitySignal (Wednesday, 8 August)
• "industry standards" (Wednesday, 8 August)
• icon internationalization (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: favicons: updated editor's draft [ACTION-276] (Wednesday, 8 August)
• favicons: updated editor's draft [ACTION-276] (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2007-07-25 (Wednesday, 8 August)
• [tracker only] ACTION-275 (Wednesday, 8 August)
• FYI: trust anchor management BOF at IETF 69 (ACTION-267) (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: WSC Open Action Items (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: Robustness proposal - Overriding SCI presentation (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: first cut usability walk through (Friday, 3 August)
• Current state of editor's draft / IdentitySignal (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: ISSUE-95: bookmark API interactions (Wednesday, 1 August)
• summary from brainstorming session in Dublin (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Re: first cut usability walk through (Wednesday, 1 August)

Timothy Hahn

• Re: New Use Case for W3C WSC (Friday, 24 August)
• RE: straw poll: Is page info summary a non-Goal? (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: icon internationalization (Wednesday, 8 August)
• Re: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-08-08 - regrets (Tuesday, 7 August)
• ACTION-277 Definition of Location Bar provided in Glossary (Friday, 3 August)
• Re: first cut usability walk through (Wednesday, 1 August)

Web Security Context Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-95: bookmark API interactions (Wednesday, 1 August)

Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-106 (cert/URL matching): We need to define details of cert/URL matching [Techniques] (Wednesday, 29 August)
• ISSUE-105: What information should be communicated about client state? [Techniques] (Sunday, 19 August)
• ISSUE-104: Some information in certificates is not trustworthy [Techniques] (Sunday, 19 August)
• ISSUE-103: Should unknown CAs and self-signed certificates be treated the same way? [Techniques] (Sunday, 12 August)
• ISSUE-102: What should be our notion of "EV" certificates? [Techniques] (Sunday, 12 August)
• ISSUE-101: Create "visiting known site that is now malware" use case as per ACTION-275 [Note: use cases etc.] (Friday, 10 August)
• ISSUE-100: Update acknowledgementst to list everyone who contributed [Note: use cases etc.] (Friday, 10 August)
• ISSUE-99: What certificate fields must be included in the identity signal? [Techniques] (Wednesday, 8 August)
• ISSUE-98: Which kind of logotype should be preferred? [Techniques] (Wednesday, 8 August)
• ISSUE-97: Should logotypes be tied to EV certificates? [Techniques] (Wednesday, 8 August)
• ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques] (Wednesday, 8 August)

Last message date: Friday, 31 August 2007 22:25:45 UTC