Re: ISSUE-92: P3P and Internet filters

On 2007-08-10 22:34:15 -0000, Close, Tyler J. wrote:

> I find this proposed text confusing since the Note doesn't
> suggest any standards or recommend building or extending
> anything. That's what the Rec document will do.

Re-reading the text, you're right.  Alternative language:

	The work outlined in this document is expected to take
	existing standards and best practices into account.  Where
	relevant, such existing work will be leveraged.

Also, we'll probably not want to forward reference specific
proposals by name.

> The text of the original issue asks that we make a recommendation that
> uses P3P technology and is compatible with "currently used Internet
> filters". That sounds like someone wants to make a recommendation
> proposal. That's fine, but I don't think the Note should be requiring
> the existence of such a proposal. Perhaps ISSUE-92 should be turned into
> an action item for the author to make a recommendation proposal. Either
> way, I don't think any edits to the Note are warranted.

Cheers,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Sunday, 12 August 2007 12:22:11 UTC