- From: Audian Paxson <Audian.Paxson@iconix.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:16:56 -0700
- To: "Serge Egelman" <egelman@cs.cmu.edu>, "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: <rachna.w3c@gmail.com>, "W3 Work Group" <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
I have learned first hand and expect that far fewer than 50% will read anything. Users click Next>Next>Next>Yes>Next until they are done. Reading is hard work! -----Original Message----- From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Serge Egelman Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 3:40 PM To: Mary Ellen Zurko Cc: rachna.w3c@gmail.com; W3 Work Group Subject: Re: first cut usability walk through Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > > "Users are habituated to clicking yes to dialog boxes regarding > security. They will not read the dialog, and instead find a way of > dismissing and continuing on to their primary task " > > Some will, and some won't. In one "in the wild" study, over half chose > expediency over security. It is in some ways a "best case" scenario for > training and context (work). See: > http://www.acsa-admin.org/2002/papers/7.pdf > I'm not sure what you're getting at here. If you mean we should expect a best case scenario of 50% reading the dialog boxes, then can't we agree that the design is fundamentally flawed? serge -- /* PhD Candidate Vice President for External Affairs, Graduate Student Assembly Carnegie Mellon University Legislative Concerns Chair National Association of Graduate-Professional Students */
Received on Friday, 10 August 2007 21:17:06 UTC