RE: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY? [Techniques]

I vote for SHOULD.  Especially if we do take a strong stance against
favicons, we need to offer marketers an alternative and more secure way
of visually branding their sites.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Web Security Context Working Group Issue Tracker
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 11:52 AM
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY?
[Techniques]


ISSUE-96: Should support for logotypes be a SHOULD or a MAY?
[Techniques]

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/

Raised by: Thomas Roessler
On product: Techniques

Should support for the display of logotypes be listed as a MAY or a
SHOULD?

a) in primary chrome?
b) in secondary chrome?

Received on Friday, 10 August 2007 19:46:14 UTC