- From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 08:25:31 -0400
- To: dan.schutzer@fstc.org
- Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFC6173328.AA8B7DB9-ON85257341.0042B454-85257341.00444121@LocalDomain>
We have two sections in wsc-usecasee that touch on education:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-usecases/#learning-by-doing
http://www.w3.org/TR/wsc-usecases/#uniformity
The first says that experience shows that while users learn, education
does not consistently produce the results desired.
The second cites on study that shows that education does not impact
susceptability to phishing. It's possible that Brustoloni's latest shows
that as well:
http://cups.cs.cmu.edu/soups/2007/proceedings/p88_sheng.pdf is more
hopeful, but shows no transfer to "realistic" behavior, in a study or in
the wild.
I gather from the discussions with the usability evaluation folks, they
believe they can address education.
Personally, I'm not a believer in direct education, mostly because no
one's brought up a single data point where users were directly educated to
do something, and did it, even when they had options that were more
attrractive for some reason (e.g. more familiar, easier). All the
promising anti phishing research makes sure that the secure option is the
most attractive (or at least comparably attractive).
On the other hand, I do believe that in circumscribed oganizations, like
the military and large companies, a system of education, reward, and
punishment can be (and is) set up to change user behavior. I would again
refer to http://www.acsa-admin.org/2002/papers/7.pdf as showing an upper
bound on how successful that can be with the option is not the most
attractive (order of 30% of the overall population).
I would be more comfortable with an education use case if we said more
somewhere about how we'll come to terms with it. Do the usability
evaluation folks know how we'll do that?
Mez
New Use Case for W3C WSC
Dan Schutzer
to:
public-wsc-wg
08/24/2007 07:52 AM
Sent by:
public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
Cc:
"'Dan Schutzer'"
I?d like to submit a new use case, shown below, that several of our
members would like included. It looks for recommendations on how to
educate customers who have fallen for a phishing email, and improve the
type of response customers generally get today when they try to access a
phishing site that has been taken down. I hope this is not too late for
consideration.
Use Case
Frank regularly reads his email in the morning. This morning he receives
an email that claims it is from his bank asking him to verify a recent
transaction by clicking on the link embedded in the email. The link does
not display the usual URL that he types to get to his bank?s website, but
it does have his bank?s name in it. He clicks on the link and is directed
to a phishing site. The phishing site has been shut down as a known
fraudulent site, so when Frank clicks on the link he receives the generic
Error 404: File Not Found page. Frank is not sure what has occurred.
Destination site
prior interaction, known organization
Navigation
none
Intended interaction
verification
Actual interaction
Was a phishing site that has been shut down
Note
Frank is likely to fall for a similar phishing email. Is there some way to
educate Frank this time, so that he is less likely to fail for the
phishing email again?
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: 01-part
Received on Friday, 24 August 2007 12:25:45 UTC