RE: FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities andfunctional limitations)

I think Use Case 2 is fine

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 4:32 PM
To: Dan Schutzer
Cc: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: FW: ISSUE-83: Scenario updates (for certain abilities
andfunctional limitations)


On 2007-08-20 06:20:15 -0400, Dan Schutzer wrote:

> Another shot at two use cases. I will have another one to add by
> end of day

Has anything happened to that from your side?

Also, I had written:

> Also, I still think we should stay away from child protection use
> cases, meaning I'd strike the second of these use cases.  If we are
> specifically after usability for children (where I think this
> started from), then I think that should be said explicitly.

... with regad to this use case:

>> Use Case 2: Mary?s eight year old daughter has asked to use the
>> home PC to

>> access the Internet. Mary gives her daughter access to her
>> computer. Mary trusts her daughter, but is concerned that she
>> might inadvertently be directed to sites with inappropriate
>> adult content and not be mature enough to handle it. How can
>> the browser warn Mary?s daughter when she tries to access a web
>> site with inappropriate content?

Any comments on this?

-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 09:31:41 UTC