public-webapps-github@w3.org from April 2015 by author

Alex Lu

Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Friday, 17 April)

Alex Russell

Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Revise CSS regions draft based on outcome of 19-March discussion (#47) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Revise CSS regions draft based on outcome of 19-March discussion (#47) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Regions (#35) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Regions (#35) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Saturday, 18 April)
[ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigate and redirects (#654) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clean up use of RFC2119 text. (e0dbaa0) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
[ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)

Alex Sexton

Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)

Alexis Menard

Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 28 April)

Alf Eaton

[ServiceWorker] Suggested edits to paragraph about declarative-only solutions (#676) (Thursday, 9 April)

Andrea Giammarchi

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Andrew Sutherland

Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 14 April)

Anne van Kesteren

[ServiceWorker] navigator.serviceWorker is not defined (#689) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [dom] Consider DOMTokenList#replace (#28) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [dom] Consider DOMTokenList#replace (#28) (Monday, 27 April)
[dom] Consider DOMTokenList#replace (#28) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Monday, 27 April)
[push-api] Service worker events (#146) (Thursday, 23 April)
[push-api] The push event (#145) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [dom] Fix another NodeIterator removing step (#27) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [dom] Fix another NodeIterator removing step (#27) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] Fix NodeIterator removing step (#24) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] createDocument link is broken (#25) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] createDocument link is broken (#25) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] Bikeshed-related fixes (#26) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Make service workers use ES strict mode (#294) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Make service workers use ES strict mode (#294) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
[streams] Avoid using binary (#337) (Saturday, 18 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Friday, 17 April)
[dom] High resolution timing for events (#23) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Track request originator. (#45) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Track request originator. (#45) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Thursday, 16 April)
[streams] "binary stream might contain chunks consisting o..." (#336) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] Copypasta in Class ReadableStreamController (#335) (Thursday, 16 April)
[streams] Copypasta in Class ReadableStreamController (#335) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Thursday, 16 April)
[streams] Use HTTPS for people.mozilla.org link (#334) (Thursday, 16 April)
[streams] Normative HTML reference is wrong (#333) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Convert DOM to use bikeshed (#15) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Convert DOM to use bikeshed (#15) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Header is all wrong (#21) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Header is all wrong (#21) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Indicate GitHub issues can now be used (#14) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Indicate GitHub issues can now be used (#14) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Too many protocol-relative URLs (#20) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Too many protocol-relative URLs (#20) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Some Conformance section stuff is duplicated (#19) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Some Conformance section stuff is duplicated (#19) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Too many protocol-relative URLs (#20) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Convert to Bikeshed. (#16) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)
[ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [fetch] Cache mode: partial content (#38) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] "I want to make an image request" (#279) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] "I want to make an image request" (#279) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560) (Sunday, 12 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Sunday, 12 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Sunday, 12 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Suggested edits to paragraph about declarative-only solutions (#676) (Sunday, 12 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigate and redirects (#654) (Sunday, 12 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [fetch] Redirects can modify request's method (#32) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [permissions] Support for background sync (one-off and periodic) (#29) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[permissions] Add "fullscreen" (#26) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[fetch] Provide opt-out for HTTP proxy authentication? (#42) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[fetch] Provide opt-in for Expect = "100-continue" (#41) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] matchAll() runs Request constructor off the main thread (#672) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
[ServiceWorker] matchAll() runs Request constructor off the main thread (#672) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
[ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] "I want to make an image request" (#279) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] 304 handling for fetch() (#412) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] 304 handling for fetch() (#412) (Sunday, 5 April)
[fetch] Cache mode: fromCache (#40) (Sunday, 5 April)
[fetch] Cache mode: security review (#39) (Sunday, 5 April)
[fetch] Cache mode: partial content (#38) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Support range request in fetch() and cache (#288) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Support range request in fetch() and cache (#288) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] What's the interaction with referrer policy (#404) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Backpressure on fetch integrated with Streams (#452) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] User-Agent header control (#399) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] User-Agent header control (#399) (Sunday, 5 April)
[fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How does the fetch event interact with system cache? (#86) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Fetch: handling upload progress events (#289) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Fetch: handling upload progress events (#289) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Add support for streams (#533) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Add support for streams (#533) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Resources shared across documents controlled by different service workers (#244) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Saturday, 4 April)
Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Saturday, 4 April)
Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) (Saturday, 4 April)
Re: [fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) (Saturday, 4 April)
Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Thursday, 2 April)
[fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [fetch] fetch() memory use proportional to amount downloaded (#33) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [fetch] Clear response body under certain conditions (#31) (Wednesday, 1 April)
[fetch] Redirects can modify request's method (#32) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [fetch] Clear response body under certain conditions (#31) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [fetch] Clear response body under certain conditions (#31) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Anssi Kostiainen

Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Friday, 17 April)
[manifest] Update the CSP reference; link directives (#362) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Thursday, 2 April)

Arthur Barstow

Re: [DOM-Level-3-Events-key] HTML validator errors (#1) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [DOM-Level-3-Events-code] HTML validation errors (#1) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [DOM-Level-3-Events-code] HTML validation errors (#1) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [DOM-Level-3-Events-key] HTML validator errors (#1) (Tuesday, 28 April)
[permissions] Boilerplate mail list should be public-webappsec (#32) (Monday, 27 April)
[DOM-Level-3-Events-code] HTML validation errors (#1) (Friday, 24 April)
[DOM-Level-3-Events-key] HTML validator errors (#1) (Friday, 24 April)
[uievents] Remove "(formerly DOM Level 3 Events)" from the title? (#1) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Thursday, 16 April)
[FileAPI] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Wednesday, 15 April)
[clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [quota-api] fixing typo (#4) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [ime-api] fixing typo (#3) (Thursday, 9 April)
[ime-api] Broken fragments in Annex.html (#2) (Wednesday, 8 April)
[ime-api] Remove reference to ime-mode? (#1) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[quota-api] Add Github repository data to boilerplate (#15) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Arthur Stolyar

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Saturday, 4 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Deprecate fetch (#28) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)

Arun Ranganathan

Re: [FileAPI] Relation to File URI scheme (#6) (Wednesday, 22 April)

Ben Francis

Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] image objects should have a background color (#366) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365) (Thursday, 23 April)
[manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (b714bc8) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [manifest] Support for Actionable Notifications in the manifest (#347) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Ben Kelly

Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Monday, 27 April)
[ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Sunday, 12 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
[streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] waitUntil promise for Install/Activate (#675) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Transform stream base class (or other helper) in toolbox (#20) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [fetch] Clear response body under certain conditions (#31) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Ben Toews

Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35) (Friday, 3 April)

Ben Turner

Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)

Benjamin Gruenbaum

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 2 April)

Bernardo Baquero Stand

Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359) (Friday, 10 April)
[manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359) (Thursday, 9 April)

Boris Zbarsky

Cameron McCormack

Re: [webidl] Make the properties on the named properties object writable, so they don't prevent assignment to undeclared props on the window. (#48) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [webidl] Fix up a bunch of cases in maplike/setlike code where we were working with the interface instance when we meant to work with the backing object or returning the backing object when we meant to return the interface instance. (#47) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22) (Friday, 17 April)

Chris Van

Re: [manifest] From a security perspective, why should the manifest be same origin? (#375) (Wednesday, 29 April)
[manifest] fix typo in `independent_policies.svg` filename (#374) (Wednesday, 29 April)

Cure53

Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)

Cătălin Badea

[ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674) (Monday, 6 April)

Cătălin Mariș

Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355) (Saturday, 11 April)
[manifest] Fix links to "SchemaStore" GitHub repository (#357) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346) (Thursday, 2 April)

Daniel Appelquist

[spec-reviews] CSV on the Web (#55) (Monday, 27 April)
[spec-reviews] contributing.md document needed for tag reviews (#53) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Thursday, 23 April)
[packaging-on-the-web] Reflect the discussion in the April 2015 F2F (#25) (Wednesday, 22 April)

David Frank

Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Sunday, 5 April)

David Graham

Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Sunday, 5 April)

David Håsäther

[xhr] Remove extraneous "=" in mail subject (#18) (Thursday, 23 April)

davidsgrogan

Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Saturday, 18 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)

dd

[push-api] Should receipt_endpoint be expose in PushSubscription of webpush api (#144) (Wednesday, 22 April)

Diego Perini

Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Wednesday, 29 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Wednesday, 29 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Saturday, 25 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 24 April)

Dimitri Glazkov

Re: [webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43) (Thursday, 30 April)
[webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43) (Thursday, 30 April)

Domenic Denicola

Re: [streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Thursday, 30 April)
[streams] Non-normative descriptions are missing for ReadableStreamController (#350) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Browser test builds are failing (#339) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [dom] Consider DOMTokenList#replace (#28) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] Move strategy to second argument, out of underlying source/sink (#340) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [streams] Separate strategy and underlying source/sink in constructor signatures (#338) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [streams] Fix FinishClosingReadableStream algorithm (#345) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [dom] Fix another NodeIterator removing step (#27) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Make sure promise returning methods don't throw (#342) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [dom] Fix NodeIterator removing step (c97daed) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Tuesday, 21 April)
[streams] Move strategy to second argument, out of underlying source/sink (#340) (Tuesday, 21 April)
[streams] Browser test builds are failing (#339) (Monday, 20 April)
[streams] Separate strategy and underlying source/sink in constructor signatures (#338) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] pipeTo with preventClose: true returns a promise that is probably fulfilled too early (#314) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel, plus fix #314 (#326) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Use HTTPS for people.mozilla.org link (#334) (Sunday, 19 April)
Re: [streams] Use HTTPS for people.mozilla.org link (#334) (Sunday, 19 April)
Re: [streams] Normative HTML reference is wrong (#333) (Sunday, 19 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Saturday, 18 April)
Re: [streams] Avoid using binary (#337) (Saturday, 18 April)
Re: [streams] Avoid using binary (#337) (Saturday, 18 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [webidl] Improve restrictions on attributes/operations when maplike/setlike are used (#49) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [webidl] Improve restrictions on attributes/operations when maplike/setlike are used (#49) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [streams] Byte streams: write up design rationales and vision for how they are used/what they enable (#177) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] Some clean up on TransformStream (#332) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] Some clean up on TransformStream (#332) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] Normative HTML reference is wrong (#333) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] Use HTTPS for people.mozilla.org link (#334) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] "binary stream might contain chunks consisting o..." (#336) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] Copypasta in Class ReadableStreamController (#335) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] Fix a typo (7f2ff8a) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Header is all wrong (#21) (Thursday, 16 April)
[dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22) (Thursday, 16 April)
[dom] Header is all wrong (#21) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Syntax-highlight code blocks (#18) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [dom] Syntax-highlight code blocks (#18) (Thursday, 16 April)
[dom] Too many protocol-relative URLs (#20) (Thursday, 16 April)
[dom] Some Conformance section stuff is duplicated (#19) (Thursday, 16 April)
[dom] Syntax-highlight code blocks (#18) (Thursday, 16 April)
[dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] TransformStream: There's no means available to fail transform() asynchronously (#331) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Fix @yutakahirano and @tyoshino's acknowledgments (#328) (Wednesday, 15 April)
[streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Tuesday, 14 April)
[streams] Fix @yutakahirano and @tyoshino's acknowledgments (#328) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel, plus fix #314 (#326) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [webidl] Make the DOMException constructor accept a name (#22) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [streams] What types does ReadableByteStream's reader's read(x) accept and return? (#295) (Monday, 13 April)
[streams] Allow enqueue after cancel, plus fix #314 (#326) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] pipe redirection (#325) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] pipe redirection (#325) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] Readable stream with ack (#324) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
[streams] Readable stream with ack (#324) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] Tidy up precondition checking in ErrorReadableStream (f6d7882) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] Port locking infrastructure to writable streams (#319) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[streams] Port locking infrastructure to writable streams (#319) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[streams] Port precise flow control to writable streams (#318) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] First draft at tee algorithms, for critique (#302) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Define "tee"ing a stream (#271) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311) (Monday, 6 April)
[streams] pipeTo with preventClose: true returns a promise that is probably fulfilled too early (#314) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Fixed typo in readable-stream-reader tests (#313) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Fixed typo in readable-stream-reader tests (#313) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Tidy up precondition checking in ErrorReadableStream (f6d7882) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [streams] Generalized and precise flow/buffer control (#301) (Saturday, 4 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [fetch] fetch() memory use proportional to amount downloaded (#33) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Doug Schepers

Re: [FileAPI] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Wednesday, 15 April)

Ed Hager

Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347) (Friday, 24 April)
[streams] Canceling tee'ed streams does not cancel original stream (#347) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[streams] Difference in the specification between notes, pseudocode and example code (#344) (Wednesday, 22 April)

Ehsan Akhgari

[ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] under what conditions should sandboxed iframes be intercepted? (#648) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Monday, 6 April)

Eric Lawless

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)

Erik Wilde

[clipboard-apis] fixing typos (#3) (Tuesday, 21 April)
[FileAPI] Relation to File URI scheme (#6) (Tuesday, 21 April)
[ime-api] fixing typo (#3) (Thursday, 9 April)
[quota-api] fixing typo (#4) (Thursday, 9 April)

Erling Ellingsen

Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)

flaki

Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658) (Tuesday, 7 April)

Frederico Caldeira Knabben

Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Thursday, 23 April)

Hallvord R. M. Steen

Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [clipboard-apis] fixing typos (#3) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [clipboard-apis] fixing typos (#3) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [clipboard-apis] Rename to index.html, fixes #1 (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Sunday, 5 April)

Hayato Ito

Re: [webcomponents] Add "http:" to the respec URL so that respec runs when viewing locally (#41) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [webcomponents] Add "http:" to the respec URL so that respec runs when viewing locally (#41) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [webcomponents] Issue 2 "Attributes is still under discussion" should be removed (#39) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [webcomponents] Is there any plan of "custom CSS selector/property/value" spec for webcomponents? (#40) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [webcomponents] Is there any plan of "custom CSS selector/property/value" spec for webcomponents? (#40) (Thursday, 9 April)

HE Shi-Jun

Re: [streams] Fix a typo (7f2ff8a) (Friday, 17 April)

Honza Bambas

Re: [fetch] Cache mode: partial content (#38) (Tuesday, 14 April)

Ilya Grigorik

Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Thursday, 30 April)
[spec-reviews] Frame Timing API (#56) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Thursday, 9 April)
[fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[fetch] Add `preload` and `prerender` contexts (#36) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35) (Friday, 3 April)

Jake Archibald

Re: [ServiceWorker] Define the lifetime of a blob URL created inside a service worker (#688) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Navigating clients from the SW context? (#681) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 14 April)
[ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Concerns about `cache.addAll` not filtering non-200 (#407) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Wednesday, 1 April)
[ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Wednesday, 1 April)

James Burke

Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 14 April)

James M Snell

Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Tuesday, 28 April)

Jan Olaf Krems

Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Monday, 13 April)

jan-ivar

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 27 April)

Janusz Majnert

Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (5a15e3f) (Wednesday, 29 April)
Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (859f05b) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Wednesday, 8 April)

Jeffrey Yasskin

[manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [webidl] Non-optional final dictionary arguments with required fields? (#46) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [webidl] Non-optional final dictionary arguments with required fields? (#46) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[webidl] Non-optional final dictionary arguments with required fields? (#46) (Tuesday, 7 April)

jhusain

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 3 April)

Johannes Wilm

Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] how does cE=typing handle autocorrect and spelling suggestions? (#37) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] How can sites access browser spellchecking? (#36) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] Should execCommand be spec'd to do nothing in cE=typing? (#33) (Thursday, 23 April)

John Mellor

Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Removed NoInterfaceObject from PushMessageData (closes #123) (#124) (Monday, 13 April)
[ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677) (Friday, 10 April)

Jonas Sicking

Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 3 April)

Joris

[dom] Fix another NodeIterator removing step (#27) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[dom] Fix NodeIterator removing step (#24) (Sunday, 19 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Saturday, 18 April)

Josh Matthews

[dom] createDocument link is broken (#25) (Tuesday, 21 April)

Joshua Bell

Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Not Found Error instead of undefined response (#666) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Friday, 24 April)
[IndexedDB] Define key extraction/injection using [[DefineOwnProperty]] and [[Get]] (#2) (Thursday, 23 April)
[IndexedDB] Asynchronously completed operations should "queue a task" (#1) (Wednesday, 22 April)

Joshua Cranmer

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)

Jungkee Song

Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] self.caches should spec what to do for "untrusted" origins (#687) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should fetchStore.match reject if no match is found? (#374) (Wednesday, 29 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] client.focus() should reject if tab failed to focus (#640) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should FetchEventInit inherit EventInit or ExtendableEventInit? (#683) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should FetchEventInit inherit EventInit or ExtendableEventInit? (#683) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should skipWaiting() wait for an "in-progress request" to finish? (#569) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] distinguish between cache failures due to network vs disk quota (#286) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] FetchEvent IDL issues (#680) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Wednesday, 15 April)
[ServiceWorker] SW's default lifetime limit (#679) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] "The user agent may terminate service workers at any time it has no event to handle." (#527) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] "The user agent may terminate service workers at any time it has no event to handle." (#527) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Define environment settings object for service workers (#526) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients & postMessage (#609) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clean up use of RFC2119 text in the spec (#397) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clean up use of RFC2119 text in the spec (#397) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Clean up use of RFC2119 text in the spec (#397) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] waitUntil promise for Install/Activate (#675) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] waitUntil promise for Install/Activate (#675) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Event queuing model for SW (#649) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Unable to easily distinguish top-level navigations (#673) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[ServiceWorker] waitUntil promise for Install/Activate (#675) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Accessing service worker state from worker (#674) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] what should Cache put operations do if the body errors out after resolving promise? (#665) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] MessageEvent within the SW global should have waitUntil() (#669) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Cache should sanitize the stored Request in put/add/addAll (#664) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Jérémie Astori

Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3) (Thursday, 16 April)
[FileAPI] Apply HTTPS fix to IETF links on TR.html too (#4) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3) (Thursday, 16 April)
[FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3) (Thursday, 16 April)
[permissions] Fixes to make pubrules compliant (#27) (Tuesday, 7 April)

karolklp

[ServiceWorker] You don't need any flags in Chrome today :) (#686) (Wednesday, 22 April)

Kenji Baheux

Re: [ServiceWorker] Association between a service worker and global objects (#652) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] HEAD request on Cache API should not return response with body (#655) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [permissions] Support for background sync (one-off and periodic) (#29) (Thursday, 9 April)
[permissions] Support for background sync (one-off and periodic) (#29) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Disable http URLs when there are no clients (#671) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] https should not be mandatory (#658) (Tuesday, 7 April)

Kenneth Rohde Christiansen

Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added background color for image object (close #366) (299aa96) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added at risk warning for theme_color (closes #356) (f482329) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Add formal defintion of language tag (closes #331) (2d7a18b) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (7e02cff) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (7e02cff) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (7e02cff) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (b714bc8) (Tuesday, 7 April)

Kinuko Yasuda

Re: [ServiceWorker] Can we replace event.default() with something less magic? (#607) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] `waitUntil()` for FetchEvent? (#584) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[quota-api] Javascript: Don't use non-constructible classes as namespaces (#3) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[quota-api] Rethink about the storage model (#2) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [quota-api] how should file de-duplication be represented? (#1) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[quota-api] how should file de-duplication be represented? (#1) (Tuesday, 7 April)

Koji Ishii

[webcomponents] Change the order of insertion points which are involved in a re-distribution in event path (W3C bug 23887) (#42) (Friday, 17 April)
[webcomponents] Add "http:" to the respec URL so that respec runs when viewing locally (#41) (Thursday, 9 April)
[webcomponents] Issue 2 "Attributes is still under discussion" should be removed (#39) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [webcomponents] Issue 2 "Attributes is still under discussion" should be removed (#38) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[webcomponents] Issue 2 "Attributes is still under discussion" should be removed (#38) (Tuesday, 7 April)

Kornel

Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Friday, 24 April)
[manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Saturday, 11 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Saturday, 11 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Saturday, 11 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
[manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No direction metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-416] (#334) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-415] (#335) (Monday, 6 April)

Kris Kowal

Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)

Kyle Simpson

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 16 April)

Lewis Phạm

Re: [ServiceWorker] Workers & SharedWorkers within ServiceWorkers (#678) (Tuesday, 21 April)
[ServiceWorker] WebRTC and getUserMedia within Service Worker (#670) (Thursday, 2 April)

Louis Ryan

Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Thursday, 2 April)

Mangala Sadhu Sangeet Singh Khalsa

[streams] WritableStream constructor: strategy should be set before sync with queue (#346) (Thursday, 23 April)

Marcos Caceres

Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Wednesday, 29 April)
Re: [manifest] From a security perspective, why should the manifest be same origin? (#375) (Wednesday, 29 April)
[manifest] Should a manifest unambigiously and authoritively be the app's metadata? (#376) (Wednesday, 29 April)
[manifest] From a security perspective, why should the manifest be same origin? (#375) (Wednesday, 29 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Wednesday, 29 April)
Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Wednesday, 29 April)
Re: [manifest] fix typo in `independent_policies.svg` filename (#374) (Wednesday, 29 April)
Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (#369) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Add requirements when the Manifest is used by crawlers (#343) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (#369) (Tuesday, 28 April)
[manifest] Add support for 9-Patch Images for splash screen (#373) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added at risk warning for theme_color (closes #356) (#368) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] image objects should have a background color (#366) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added background color for image object (close #366) (#370) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (859f05b) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Add formal defintion of language tag (closes #331) (#367) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] For `lang`, add formal defintion of language tag (#331) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] A means to control how long a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] A means to specify the min time a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
[manifest] A means to specify the min time a splash screen should remain on screen. (#372) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (57b55de) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [manifest] Resolve start_url against manifest URL (#330) (Monday, 27 April)
[manifest] Added splashscreens member (closes #9) (#371) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] Added background color for image object (close #366) (#370) (Monday, 27 April)
[manifest] Added background color for image object (close #366) (#370) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] Must manifests be same-origin? (#360) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (#369) (Monday, 27 April)
[manifest] Note about manifest and crawlers (closes #343) (#369) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] Add requirements when the Manifest is used by crawlers (#343) (Monday, 27 April)
[manifest] Added at risk warning for theme_color (closes #356) (#368) (Monday, 27 April)
[manifest] Add formal defintion of language tag (closes #331) (#367) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No localized examples; [I18N-ISSUE-413] (#337) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-415] (#335) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-415] (#335) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No means of obtaining correctly localized manifest; [I18N-ISSUE-414] (#336) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No means of obtaining correctly localized manifest; [I18N-ISSUE-414] (#336) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [permissions] Boilerplate mail list should be public-webappsec (#32) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [permissions] Boilerplate mail list should be public-webappsec (#32) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] image objects should have a background color (#366) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Friday, 24 April)
[manifest] image objects should have a background color (#366) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [manifest] Is prefer_related_applications too simplistic? (#365) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (b714bc8) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[manifest] Won't related_application be needed at page load? (#364) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [manifest] A way to link to related applications (#326) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [manifest] shouldn't the default scope be bounded? (#332) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[manifest] Deep linking - need proper use cases and requirements analysis (#363) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [permissions] Geolocation API does not leave the page unaware of permission status (#30) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [manifest] Update the CSP reference; link directives (#362) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [manifest] Update the CSP reference; link directives (#362) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [manifest] Convert "Icon object" into a generic "image object" (#327) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (#358) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (#358) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Remove [NoInterfaceObject] from PushMessageData (#123) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 10 April)
[manifest] Convert icon object to image object (close #327) (#358) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Fix links to "SchemaStore" GitHub repository (#357) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Fix links to "SchemaStore" GitHub repository (#357) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] "This version" link => 404 (#354) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [permissions] Fixes to make pubrules compliant (#27) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [permissions] Fixes to make pubrules compliant (#27) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Small editorial fixes (#352) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[manifest] Small editorial fixes (#352) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Monday, 6 April)
[manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [permissions] Move to using Echidna (#24) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [permissions] Move to using Echidna (#24) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [permissions] Move to using Echidna (#24) (Monday, 6 April)
[permissions] Move to using Echidna (#24) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [permissions] A few typos (#23) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] i18n: No language metadata for 'name'; [I18N-ISSUE-415] (#335) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Allow using metatags instead of JSON (#350) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349) (Saturday, 4 April)
Re: [manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349) (Saturday, 4 April)
Re: [manifest] Triage privacy issues (#348) (Thursday, 2 April)
[manifest] Changed file extension of web manifest (closes #346) (#349) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346) (Thursday, 2 April)
[manifest] Triage privacy issues (#348) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [manifest] difference between lang and default_locale (#345) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [manifest] The use of the `.manifest` file extension may be problematic / confusing ? (#346) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Marijn Kruisselbrink

Re: [ServiceWorker] Interception of the fallback requests initiated from a SW for cross-origin resources (#684) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A header-based SW installation (#685) (Wednesday, 22 April)

Marius Gundersen

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Sunday, 5 April)
Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Mark Nottingham

Re: [spec-reviews] WebRTC (#14) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Font Loading (#20) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Web NFC API (#22) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Navigation Error Logging (#24) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] multipart/form-data (#34) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] multipart/form-data (#34) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Browser Fingerprinting Document (#38) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] JSON Form Submission (#40) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSS Variables (#41) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSP (#42) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Subresource Integrity (#43) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [fetch] Standardize "nosniff" (#35) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] http-problem (#37) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Martin Thomson

Re: [push-api] Should receipt_endpoint be expose in PushSubscription of webpush api (#144) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Thursday, 2 April)

Mathias Bynens

Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Sunday, 19 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] `user-agent` header control (#37) (Tuesday, 7 April)

Matt Cook

Re: [ServiceWorker] consider exposing size for cache entries (#587) (Tuesday, 28 April)

Matt Falkenhagen

Re: [ServiceWorker] There should be no such thing as "fail to activate" (#659) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A header/something to kill SWs (#614) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Should FetchEventInit inherit EventInit or ExtendableEventInit? (#683) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] How are unloaded tabs represented? (#626) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Make service workers use ES strict mode (#294) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] When responses from origin A are used in response to a request for origin B, treat as a redirect (#560) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A header/something to kill SWs (#614) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] ServiceWorker to "service worker" mapping and stability (#622) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Consider producing distinct objects for the same entity to enable garbage collection (#416) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659) (Thursday, 2 April)

meandmycode

Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Tuesday, 14 April)

Michael Stillwell

Re: [fetch] fetch() memory use proportional to amount downloaded (#33) (Wednesday, 15 April)
[fetch] fetch() memory use proportional to amount downloaded (#33) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Michael van Ouwerkerk

Re: [push-api] Fix method links from IDL. (#143) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[push-api] Fix method links from IDL. (#143) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#142) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#142) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Readme implementations (#141) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Any implementation ? (#119) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[push-api] Readme implementations (#141) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Add serializer for PushSubscription and run tidy. (#140) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Define a serializer for PushSubscription (#125) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[push-api] Add serializer for PushSubscription and run tidy. (#140) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename userVisible to userVisibleOnly (#138) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
[permissions] Rename PermissionStatus.status to PermissionStatus.state (#31) (Monday, 20 April)
[permissions] Geolocation API does not leave the page unaware of permission status (#30) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
[push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [push-api] Remove PushManager#hasPermission in favor of Permissions API (#109) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [push-api] Remove PushManager#hasPermission in favor of Permissions API (#109) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [push-api] Remove registrationId (#56) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename "App server" to "Application server" in diagram (#135) (Thursday, 16 April)
[push-api] Rename "App server" to "Application server" in diagram (#135) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Add the source of the sequence diagram in vdx format. (#134) (Thursday, 16 April)
[push-api] Add the source of the sequence diagram in vdx format. (#134) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Removed NoInterfaceObject from PushMessageData (closes #123) (#124) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Push service definition (#128) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Fixing definition of push message (#126) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [push-api] Fixing definition of push message (#126) (Monday, 13 April)

Michael[tm] Smith

Re: [webcomponents] Add "http:" to the respec URL so that respec runs when viewing locally (#41) (Thursday, 9 April)

miguelgarciaarribas

[push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#142) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#139) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[push-api] Rename hasPermission to permissionState (#139) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Tuesday, 21 April)

Mike Sherov

Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)

Mike West

Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [fetch] Track request originator. (#45) (Thursday, 16 April)
[fetch] Track request originator. (#45) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Thursday, 16 April)
[spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Monday, 13 April)
[spec-reviews] Credential Management API (#49) (Monday, 13 April)

Miller Medeiros

Re: [streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[streams] listen() (#341) (Wednesday, 22 April)

Mounir Lamouri

Re: [permissions] Flesh out more complex permission issues we see down the road (#28) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Manifest format should support some way of including a splash screen (#9) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Tuesday, 7 April)
[manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [manifest] Add related_applications and prefer_related_applications. (#344) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [permissions] Why "prompt" instead of "default"? (#25) (Tuesday, 7 April)

Nick Doty

Re: [manifest] Triage privacy issues (#348) (Thursday, 2 April)

Nikhil Marathe

Re: [ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[ServiceWorker] Clients.claim() does not deal with a client already controlled by another registration (#682) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Client.postMessage should return a Promise (#677) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [fetch] URLs with username/password (#26) (Friday, 3 April)

Nora Lorinda Nattress

Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [manifest] About Installations: API vs Signals — ¿case for Desktop-only API? (#359) (Friday, 10 April)

Olivier Forget

Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Thursday, 23 April)
[editing-explainer] execCommand has now been spec'd to trigger a "User Intent" for cut/copy/paste (#47) (Thursday, 23 April)

Paritosh Kumar

[ServiceWorker] Should FetchEventInit inherit EventInit or ExtendableEventInit? (#683) (Sunday, 19 April)

Paul Cotton

Paul Em

Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [push-api] Move to using just endpoint (#129) (Thursday, 16 April)

Paul Irish

[spec-reviews] permissions.md - remove extra quotes (#52) (Saturday, 18 April)

Paul Kinlan

Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] What's the use case for theme_color? (#356) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Made using fallbacks normative (closes #350) (#351) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Obtaining a Manifest should follow usual CORS rules with credentials. (#353) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Add meta tags equivs. for features were possible (#350) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [manifest] Define identity of a web app. (#272) (Friday, 3 April)

Peter Beverloo

Re: [push-api] Should receipt_endpoint be expose in PushSubscription of webpush api (#144) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Monday, 20 April)
[push-api] Rename userVisible to userVisibleOnly (#138) (Monday, 20 April)
[push-api] userVisible -> userVisibleOnly (#137) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [push-api] Add a PushSubscriptionOptions dictionary with a userVisible option. (#131) (Thursday, 2 April)

Petka Antonov

Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27) (Thursday, 2 April)

Philip Jägenstedt

Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] permissions API (#45) (Thursday, 9 April)

Philip Rogers

[permissions] Flesh out more complex permission issues we see down the road (#28) (Tuesday, 7 April)

phistuck

Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Saturday, 25 April)
Re: [push-api] Rename hasPermission (#136) (Friday, 17 April)

Rahul Ravikumar

Re: [manifest] Support for Actionable Notifications in the manifest (#347) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [manifest] Support for Actionable Notifications in the manifest (#347) (Thursday, 2 April)

Rick Byers

Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [touch-events] Not all touch events should be synchronous and uncancelable (#6) (Tuesday, 14 April)

Robin Berjon

Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Thursday, 16 April)
[clipboard-apis] Rename to index.html, fixes #1 (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [manifest] Use `https://` where possible (#355) (Monday, 13 April)

Ryan Dunckel

Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)

Ryosuke Niwa

Re: [webcomponents] Add `proposals` directory. (#43) (Thursday, 30 April)

Sebastian Kippe

Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [manifest] Ability to define platform-specific icon style (#361) (Saturday, 11 April)

Simon Pieters

Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Tuesday, 28 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Sunday, 19 April)
[spec-reviews] CSSOM View document.scrollingElement (#51) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Wednesday, 15 April)

Tab Atkins Jr.

Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22) (Tuesday, 21 April)
[dom] Bikeshed-related fixes (#26) (Tuesday, 21 April)
Re: [dom] {{ }}s are showing up in the output (#22) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Monday, 20 April)
[FileAPI] Bikeshedding the spec (#5) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [dom] Syntax-highlight code blocks (#18) (Thursday, 16 April)
[dom] Convert to Bikeshed. (#16) (Wednesday, 15 April)

Takeshi Yoshino

Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Byte streams tracking bug (#300) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Extract the minimal algorithm from which we can easily infer the public behavior of the interfaces (#312) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Extract the minimal algorithm from which we can easily infer the public behavior of the interfaces (#312) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349) (Thursday, 30 April)
[streams] Add tests for checking that tee() branches are errored/closed when the o... (#349) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348) (Thursday, 30 April)
[streams] Add SNAPSHOT-LINK argument to the bikeshed command line in README.md (#348) (Thursday, 30 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [streams] Move strategy to second argument, out of underlying source/sink (#340) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [streams] Move strategy to second argument, out of underlying source/sink (#340) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Thursday, 23 April)
[streams] Fix FinishClosingReadableStream algorithm (#345) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[streams] Add ReadableByteStream definition (#343) (Wednesday, 22 April)
[streams] Make sure promise returning methods don't throw (#342) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (a9037ac) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [streams] Restructure pulling algorithm to be more obvious and correct (ac6b2b7) (Friday, 17 April)
Re: [streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel, plus fix #314 (#326) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Precise flow control for readable streams (#317) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330) (Wednesday, 15 April)
[streams] Some clean up on TransformStream (#332) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] TransformStream: There's no means available to fail transform() asynchronously (#331) (Wednesday, 15 April)
[streams] TransformStream: There's no means available to fail transform() asynchronously (#331) (Wednesday, 15 April)
[streams] TransformStream: transform() is never invoked via pull() (#330) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Fix @yutakahirano and @tyoshino's acknowledgments (#328) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [streams] Support reading bytes into buffers allocated by user code on platforms where only async read is available (#253) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Fix #314: pipeTo return value with preventClose: true (5250b3d) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel (961d6d1) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel (961d6d1) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Allow enqueue after cancel (961d6d1) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Fix assert in ErrorReadableStream being triggered sometimes (884d4b7) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Ensure asserts are surfaced in the reference implementation (3144a19) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] Add fine-grained flow control for readable stream (adb6f73) (Tuesday, 14 April)
[streams] readBatch() or getSyncReader() (#327) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] pipe redirection (#325) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Port locking infrastructure to writable streams (#319) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Readable stream with ack (#324) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Readable stream with ack (#324) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Thursday, 9 April)
[streams] pipe redirection (#325) (Thursday, 9 April)
[streams] Identity transform performance and ArrayBufferView ownership (#323) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] Port locking infrastructure to writable streams (#319) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] pipeTo with preventClose: true returns a promise that is probably fulfilled too early (#314) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] Do writable streams need separate signals for write-success vs. write-accepted? (#316) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] can streams be transferred via postMessage()? (#276) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [streams] Tidy up precondition checking in ErrorReadableStream (f6d7882) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [streams] Implement teeing, plus a bunch of stage-setting tweaks (#311) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Implement readable stream teeing (b326a6e) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Tweak spec mechanics of WritableStream Error Functions (84efaaf) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Factor out ReadFromReadableStreamReader abstract operation (ec27914) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Add and update notes on using abstract ops from other specs (80e578d) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Tidy up precondition checking in ErrorReadableStream (f6d7882) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] Distinguishing between errors (#25) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Extract the minimal algorithm from which we can easily infer the public behavior of the interfaces (#312) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Extract the minimal algorithm from which we can easily infer the public behavior of the interfaces (#312) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [ServiceWorker] Provide opt-in to avoid request body duplication (#533) (Monday, 6 April)
Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Thursday, 2 April)
[fetch] Access to the HTTP trailer (#34) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312) (Thursday, 2 April)
Re: [streams] Define the streams interface only with publicly visible behavior (#312) (Thursday, 2 April)
[streams] Define the streams interface with only publicly visible behavior (#312) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [streams] Making the "queue manipulator" its own class (#309) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [streams] Factor out a new EnqueueInReadableStream abstract operation (329f696) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [streams] Factor out a new CloseReadableStream abstract operation (85d0645) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Tobie Langel

Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Monday, 27 April)
Re: [dom] Several references are now wrong after Bikeshed conversion (#17) (Saturday, 25 April)

Travis Leithead

Re: [uievents] Remove "(formerly DOM Level 3 Events)" from the title? (#1) (Thursday, 30 April)

Trevor Norris

Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Sunday, 12 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Sunday, 12 April)

Tsuyoshi Horo

Re: [ServiceWorker] Prevent opaque requests being used in response to client requests (#590) (Wednesday, 15 April)

Wendy Seltzer

[permissions] A few typos (#23) (Friday, 3 April)
[permissions] Privacy Considerations (#22) (Friday, 3 April)

Xabier Rodríguez

Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315) (Monday, 13 April)
Re: [streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315) (Wednesday, 8 April)
[streams] Added some more readable stream tests (#315) (Tuesday, 7 April)
Re: [streams] Fixed typo in readable-stream-reader tests (#313) (Monday, 6 April)
[streams] Fixed typo in readable-stream-reader tests (#313) (Monday, 6 April)

Xiaoqian Cindy Wu

Re: [FileAPI] Apply HTTPS fix to IETF links on TR.html too (#4) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [FileAPI] Switch all links towards tools.ietf.org to HTTPS (#3) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [FileAPI] Update the link of RFC2119 (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [FileAPI] Update the link of RFC2119 (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)
[FileAPI] Update the link of RFC2119 (#2) (Thursday, 16 April)

Yan Zhu

Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50) (Thursday, 23 April)
[spec-reviews] Strawman spec review for upgrade insecure requests (#54) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] Upgrade Insecure Requests (#50) (Thursday, 23 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] permissions.md - remove extra quotes (#52) (Monday, 20 April)
Re: [spec-reviews] permissions.md - remove extra quotes (#52) (Monday, 20 April)

Yoav Weiss

Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Thursday, 16 April)
Re: [fetch] Initializing context/content specific fetch defaults (#43) (Thursday, 16 April)

youennf

Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Thursday, 9 April)
Re: [streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Wednesday, 8 April)
[streams] Should ReadableStreamController be visible? (#322) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Wednesday, 1 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Wednesday, 1 April)

Yutaka Hirano

Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Friday, 24 April)
Re: [streams] Transform streams and acknowledgement of writes (#329) (Wednesday, 22 April)
Re: [streams] Fix @yutakahirano and @tyoshino's acknowledgments (#328) (Wednesday, 15 April)
Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44) (Tuesday, 14 April)
[fetch] Is it allowed to create a GET request with body? (#44) (Tuesday, 14 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] rsReader.readBatch(numberOfChunks)? rbsReader.read(view, { waitUntilDone: true })? (#320) (Friday, 10 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321) (Wednesday, 8 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)
Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308) (Friday, 3 April)

Yves Lafon

Re: [clipboard-apis] Use "index.html" as the filename of the spec. (#1) (Thursday, 16 April)

勾三股四

[webcomponents] Is there any plan of "custom CSS selector/property/value" spec for webcomponents? (#40) (Wednesday, 8 April)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 April 2015 21:57:41 UTC