Re: [streams] explicity operate on underlying source and sink instead of public methods (#321)

> I think it would suck if you couldn't pipe a ReadableStream to a WritableByteStream.

You absolutely could, but it would use whatever path WritableStream.write() method uses on that object.  (The underlying sinks are un-specc'd, but it seems there must be a way to do a simple write.)

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/321#issuecomment-91049998