Re: [fetch] Aborting a fetch (#27)

I wrote 3 proposals ... which one you actually think would be the best candidate? Not sure I understood that: the [silently resolved](https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/a015c9c02ff2482d327e) one, the [chainable cancel](https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/0ca8fac8013f76fb4d06) that rejects, or the [reject only](https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/1a87023b4f31a15b18da)?

About @petkaantonov semantics, I personally find it very inconvenient to need to export cancelability to the external scope somehow in order to pass it back to the callback passed to `.cancellable()` ... it feels like an unnecessary overhead and once again the cancelability comes from there `resolve` and `reject` are passed ... I feel like my optional third argument is easier and more practical than that.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/27#issuecomment-88980014