Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)

@slightlyoff I think the problem is there's a difference between activating and activated: the current spec blocks navigation until the activating worker becomes activated. If the worker "failed to activate" (called waitUntil(rejected)), should we continue to block or do something else like bypass the worker? Or maybe even say waitUntil(rejected) means the same as waitUntil(resolved)... the worker becomes activated?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/659#issuecomment-93687679