Re: [ServiceWorker] should Cache support VARY:*,otherheader or only VARY:* (#656)

@jungkees, I think you need to parse the VARY header in case the * is embedded in a single value like `VARY:*,foo`.  This was done in the existing spec language like this:

> Let varyHeaders be the array containing the elements corresponding to the field-values of the Vary header.

So I think we need to say if any of the field-values in any of the VARY headers is *, then reject.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/656#issuecomment-88483121