- From: Marcos Caceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:09:53 -0700
- To: w3c/manifest <manifest@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 6 April 2015 20:10:24 UTC
> I'll ping you, but it'll be disappointing, since it's currently minimal :) Minimal is good. Makes a case for dropping redundant stuff. > I haven't thought about any special hosting for it, but we're moving the entire app behind a CDN, so technically it'll be on a CDN too. This is going to sound like a really stupid question (but important for an ongoing debate in #272), but how much of an issue would it be for FT if the browser didn't allow you to host this on a CDN (i.e., the manifest was forced to be same origin)? If that is a problem, what would you do instead? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/manifest/issues/350#issuecomment-90226112
Received on Monday, 6 April 2015 20:10:24 UTC