Re: [streams] ReadableStream.getReader name is a bit misleading (#308)

So, I'm really not seeing anything here that's materially better than getReader. (There's a lot of off-topic stuff about re-designing the streams API entirely, but this is not the thread for that.) And the arguments against getReader have not been that strong, and have counter-arguments in most cases. As such, I think it's best to just stick with `getReader()`.

Thanks for your thoughts though @youennf; I hope you felt they were given fair consideration.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/308#issuecomment-89406427