Re: [ServiceWorker] A worker that fails to activate should relinquish its controllees (#659)

> Or maybe even say waitUntil(rejected) means the same as waitUntil(resolved)... the worker becomes activated?

This is what we decided 100 years ago when we met in SF. I'm open to better models, but having a registration without any workers seems to open up a whole load of problems.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/slightlyoff/ServiceWorker/issues/659#issuecomment-95244473

Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 15:53:53 UTC