Telecon Agenda - December 1st 2011, 1400 UTC
Mixing-up Semantic Data with HTML Rendering
RDFa Lite - New publication-ready First Public Working Draft
Would RDFa support Named Graph ?
JSON-LD and the RDFa distiller
Closure of ISSUE-113, based on your Last Call comments
Looking at HTML Literal
Default Vocabulary for datatype: datatypeLibrary attribute
My opinions on the remaining issues (ISSUE-108, ISSUE-114, ISSUE-115, ISSUE-117, ISSUE-119, ISSUE-121)
Traces of RDFa profiles remain in rdfa-core
Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE (ISSUE-118)
Closure of ISSUE-116, based on your Last Call comments
Last call comment admin: resolution of ISSUE-97
Plan of action / this weeks telco cancelled
ISSUE-121: Using @id to set subject in RDFa [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa
- Re: ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa
- Re: ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa
- Re: ISSUE: Using @id to set subject in RDFa (ISSUE-121)
Updated RDFa Core Source to implement resolution on ISSUE-118
on the OWL terms
Updated the Src file for the RDFa Core, implementing the resolution on ISSUE-116
ISSUE-120: This would mean adding to the current set of terms owl:equivalentProperty and owl:equivalentClass.
ISSUE-119 (lite-resource): Should we concider adding @resource to RDFa Lite and drop @about instead? [RDFa 1.1 Lite]
Using @resource instead of @about in RDFa Lite
On the meeting of *next week*
Fwd: Parsing Microdata into RDF Graphs: URI Comparison (relevant to ISSUE-114)
Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17
- Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17
- Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17
- Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17
- Re: Agenda for telco, 2011-11-17
ISSUE-118 (term syntax): Should we consider allowing the '/' character in a term [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE
- Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE
- Re: Maybe a new pandora's box? '/' in a CURIE
Just checking out where we are with RDFa issues
ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
- Re: ISSUE-117 (about-on-HTML): Consider disallowing @about on <html> [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
ISSUE-116 (vocab-owl): Consider owl terms for vocab expansion [2nd LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
Suggestion for 10.2.1 RDFa core - mention owl:equivalentClass and owl:equivalentProperty as useful documentation
Thank you for the detailed documentation
Fwd: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats)
- Re: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats)
- Re: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats) (ISSUE-108)
Behavior of @property with @typeof and incomplete triples
schema.org and rdfa 1.1
Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary
- Re: Triple(s) that describe the vocabulary
Updated the Primer
RDFa 1.1 Core updated
Admin issue on publication vs. charter
@rel and @property symmetry
Fwd: Link relations in RDFa (Was: Re: Guidance on publishing in multiple formats)
Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97)
- Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97)
- Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97)
- Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97)
- Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97)
- Re: Looking at the time element (again) (ISSUE-97)
- RE: <time> values in HTML5