- From: landong zuo <landong.zuo@googlemail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:30:55 +0000
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACNn1bpBk7KYAFWxMbkVSbOYQSu1Q0BAyOtgvf8_r5AX06TAAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, I have been looking around for a "recommended" solution to render Named Graph in XHTML+RDFa syntax but with no luck. I am not sure if this is the right place to raise this question. Or, if this issue was already concluded previously in RDFa Work Group. I am sorry if it was. My use case originates from the Trust and Provenance of Semantic Data Publishing. In such a case, we need to publish the RDF triples alongside with its metadata, e.g. provenance and digital signature. This can be done in TriG syntax by identifying the named graph and specifying the relationship between graphs. However, if we want to render the triples in XHTML+RDFa page, there is not a straight way to represent the named graphs in RDFa syntax. I've caught up with previous discussion between Mark Birbeck and Michael Hausenblas at the link below. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0114.html As Mark made his point that RDFa is supposed to carry all triples from single RDF graph and there is not need to put Named Graph in RDFa syntax. I am wondering if this assumption has somehow restricted the expressivity of RDFa, i.e. metadata with strong coherent relationship can not be published within the same page of the document? I am looking forward to your comment and suggestion. Further discussion and information is warmly welcomed. Regards, Landong Zuo Semantic Web Developer The Stationery Office Tel: 44 (0) 1603 696920 Mobile: +44 (0) 7702192131 Email: landong.zuo@tso.co.uk Web: www.tso.co.uk Orders: www.tsoshop.co.uk
Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 13:11:26 UTC