- From: landong zuo <landong.zuo@googlemail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:18:10 +0000
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
Hi All, May I share some my sought regarding “RDFa semantics” from the perspective of Semantic Data Publishing. When RDF triple is published via XHTML+RDFa syntax, it is supposed that the “semantic meaning” of the page is independent from the HTML rendering. The RDFa extractor would get the equivalent set of triples from XHTML page as it was published in RDF. The “semantic meaning” here references to the RDF canonicalization approach developed by Jeremy J. Carroll [1]. The semantic equivalence can be matched via Jena graph implementation: Boolean Graph.isIsomorphicWith(Graph g). However, RDFa intents to reuse XHTML syntax like “@rel” and “@href”. I wonder if this would blur some semantic content of XHTML page by mixing-up non-semantic information like CSS with triples? For example, a XHTML page should state the link to CSS like <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/Styles/theme.css" /> This would probably suggest creating triples in RDFa extractor like below, <http://blah.co.uk/... > <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab#stylesheet> <http://blah.co.uk/Styles/theme.css> . Although this triple does not exist in the original dataset. The Jena equivalence method would tell a mismatch if the RDFa extraction is compared to the original RDF. So, my question is “what should we consider as the RDFa semantics?” Should publisher be free to publish the semantic data in whatever the HTML rendering without impact to the result of RDFa extraction? If answer to this question is Yes, should we consider to distinguish semantic data from non-semantic data in the same XHTML+RDFa page? Or should we revise the RDFa processing model to make this distinguishing to the RDFa extractor? [1] Jeremy J. Carroll, Signing RDF Graphs, available at http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2003/HPL-2003-142.pdf Regards, Landong Zuo Semantic Web Developer The Stationery Office Web: www.tso.co.uk Orders: www.tsoshop.co.uk TSO Information and Publishing Solutions Part of the Williams Lea Group www.williamslea.com Every day, decisions are made that affect you – do you know enough to have your say? Keep up with Official Publishing at: www.haveyoursayonline.net P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
Received on Monday, 28 November 2011 13:18:41 UTC