- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:04:46 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, Shane P McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Having checked the spec: the value of @typeof is a TERMorCURIEorAbsIRI; a TERM is an NCName. Ie, alas!, my program works properly. So the question becomes more specific: can we allow a TERM to be an extension of NCName that also allows the '/' character? Do we need it (Dan?)? Does it lead to major issues if we don't? Sigh... Ivan On Nov 16, 2011, at 09:33 , Ivan Herman wrote: > So... I hope I am wrong and it is only my implementation that behaves badly. > > The canonical example we have these days is something like > > <div vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="Some_Type"> .... </div> > > However. I am not sure what the extension model of schema.org entails (hence an explicit cc of this mail to Dan and Jeni). Does it mean that some types or predicates will have a URI of the form: http://schema.org/A/B ? > > If so, then we should be able to say in RDFa > > <div vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="A/B"> ... </div> > > Hence the next question (and cc-ing explicitly to Shane, who knows this inside out): is this allowed at this moment? My impression is that it is not, at least my implementation has problems with it. If it is only my implementation, I can deal with it at least... > > So: please, pretty please, make my mind at ease that we have no problem here!:-) > > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 11:02:19 UTC