- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:30:18 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <9201902E-39D6-4FD6-A355-6778BBF8D8A8@w3.org>
On Nov 9, 2011, at 24:42 , Gregg Kellogg wrote: > I've implemented the new steps, and my processor passes all the test cases (list problems were due to a 2-character bug: else != elsif :P). Great! (We should have intelligent compilers that recognize such misspelling:-) > > However, the changes do cause some existing test suite tests to fail, as they should: > > 0046: @typeof with @rel present, no @href, @resource, or @about > This fails because of the different interpretation of @typeof with no @about. > > 0047: @typeof with @rel and @resource present, no @about > This fails because of the different interpretation of @typeof with @resource. > > 0058: hanging @rel creates multiple triples, @typeof permutation > 0078: Multiple incomplete triples > 0081: multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rev) > 0082: multiple ways of handling incomplete triples (with @rel and @rev) > These fail because the of re-interpretation of @property with @typeof > Yes, indeed. > If we approve this change to @property, this would remove these test cases from rdfa1.1. We may need to reproduce them with alternate expectations. Yes. But the page still contains technical issues regarding the inconsistency of the @property vs. chaining behaviour. We should discuss that... Ivan > > Gregg > > On Nov 7, 2011, at 5:11 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> I have made some changes on [1]: one of the test cases was erroneous (the HTML part was wrong), I have added 2 more test cases, and, most importantly, I have updated the processing steps so that it now covers both the @property and the @typeof changes. >> >> I have an implementation running locally, passing all the tests on the page. However, my implementation does not follow 100% the processing steps, ie, it differs slightly from what is written there. Would be good if somebody made a thorough check on those. >> >> I think we should really share this page, asap, with the HTML Data task force as well as the schema.org people. Gregg and I did not want to do that until we get at least some approval from the group... Anybody? >> >> Ivan >> >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/wiki/PropertyAndTypeof >> >> >> On Nov 4, 2011, at 14:50 , Ivan Herman wrote: >> >>> ... and I have made additions and some changes on the page. In particular, I have added a more detailed description on the rules, and I have also added a new version of the RDFa 1.1 example of the schama.org page. >>> >>> Would be good to have a green light on sending this reference to Guha, DanBri, Peter, to gather feedbacks asap >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> Tracker, for ACTION-102, this completes my action >>> >> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 08:28:03 UTC