- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:23:21 +0100
- To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 11, 2011, at 16:09 , Toby Inkster wrote: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:52:04 -0500 > Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote: > >> In my version of the proposals, I perform lexical analysis of >> @datetime against xsd:date, xsd:dateTime and xsd:time and choose the >> datatype based on the match. It's quite simple. > > This is what I do for <time> handling in my Microdata parser (though > IIRC I also support all of the xsd:gFoo types too). I'd support adding > something like this to (X)HTML+RDFa 1.1, but I think it's too > HTML-specific to be added to Core. > > Note that this should be trigger specifically by the <time> element, > and should not apply to all elements with a @datetime attribute. This > is because we probably wouldn't want to pick up @datetime on <ins> and > <del>. > Agree on all account! This should go to the HTML5 stuff. Note also Jeni's comment: it is not only the datetime attribute: if the attribute is not around, the content of the date element should also be considered. Ivan > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 15:20:51 UTC