- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:06:51 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Péter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>
- Message-Id: <90CAE84A-FC85-4A61-A2F9-233BCE277840@w3.org>
Gregg, I just try to go down the line of concentrating on @typeof; maybe that reaches the same goal as what we wanted, but makes a change in RDFa that might be, possibly, cleaner. This is not fully worked out yet... Let us consider changing the behaviour of @typeof such that: 1. if (@rel/@rev is present, but no @resource/@href/@src) or (@property is present, @rel/@rev is not, and no @resource/@href/@src) then - @typeof creates a blank node - that blank node is the current_object (ie, the one going down the chain) - is the subject of the type triples 2. if @resource/@href/@src is present _as well as_ @typeof, then no blank node is generated, and the subject of the type triples is the IRI resource of @resource/@href/@src Both of these rules are different than what we have now; all other rules for @typeof remain unchanged. The advantage is that there is no difference between @rel/@rev on the one hand and @property on the other hand with respect to @typeof. Of course, what I called the 'minimalist' change for @property, as you described on the wiki, remains valid, too. What we get is: <div about="relV" rel="t:foo" typeof="t:Bar"><span property="t:yip">Yes</span></div> => <relV> t:foo [ a t:Bar; t:yip "Yes" ] . <div about="relP" property="t:foo" typeof="t:Bar"><span property="t:yip">Yes</span></div> => <relP> t:foo [ a t:Bar; t:yip "Yes" ] . Both by virtue of #1 above. The reason for the #2 rule above is that if I have <div about="relV2" rel="t:foo" typeof="t:Bar" href="http://example.org"> Our current rules would assign a type to <relV2>, but this is really not consistent with the fact that, without @href, the typing goes to the 'right hand' of @rel, so to say. With that modification, what we get is: <div about="relV2" rel="t:foo" typeof="t:Bar" href="http://example.org"> <span property="t:yip">Yes</span> </div> => <relV2> t:foo <http://example.org> . <http://example.org> a t:Bar; t:yip "Yes" . <div about="relP2" property="t:foo" href="http://example2.org" typeof="t:Bar"> <span property="t:yip">Yes</span> </div> => <relP2> t:foo <http://example2.org> . <http://example2.org> a t:Bar; t:yip "Yes" . Thoughts? Ivan ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 13:07:17 UTC