Just checking out where we are with RDFa issues

Now that we have passed a significant hurdle, I gathered the current open issues on RDFa. Some of these should be doable easily, but we should try to make decision nevertheless. Note that I took the liberty to add issues 116 and 117 to reflect discussions happening at various places lately.

Here is where we are:

- ISSUE-18  [1]: Determine how ODF will integrate RDFa 1.1
- ISSUE-116 [2]: Consider owl terms for vocab expansion 

- ISSUE-115 [3]: Explanation on the Fragment ID in @about may be misleading (RDFa Lite)

- ISSUE-97  [4]: Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5
- ISSUE-108 [5]: Refine/deprecate Link relations for the RDFa 1.1 Default Profile.
- ISSUE-113 [6]: Add the value attribute of the HTML data element as a possible literal target for property
- ISSUE-114 [7]: HTML5 content model for @href/@src coerces values to URLs
- ISSUE-117 [8]: Consider disallowing @about on <html>

Looking at the list:

- 18 seems to be an old leftover, not sure what this means for today (we may just close it)
- 116 has to be discussed and decided upon
- 115 is an editorial small issue
- 97 and 113 are pretty much along the same lines, should be decided
- 108 should be discussed and decided upon
- 114 is a really hard one:-(
- 117 should be discussed and decided upon


[1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/18
[2] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/116
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/115
[4] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/97
[5] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/108
[6] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/113
[7] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/114

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 17:58:42 UTC