- From: landong zuo <landong.zuo@googlemail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 11:19:21 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACNn1bpM2o_ap_Rr=-R_76fMrOxnJwj7d59usWjDE2NacNLARA@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Ivan, Many thanks to your response. I am very pleased to know that Named Graph will be in the agenda of future RDFa discussion. I would be very interested to participate in this if it is possible. Regards, Landong On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Dear, Landong, > > RDFa does not have any syntax for named graphs at this time. For the time > being the issue of named graph (semantics, possible syntaxes, etc) is still > being discussed in the RDF WG and it would be premature to add this to > RDFa. This is clearly the topic of future discussions for a next release of > RDFa once the RDF concepts have been clarified. > > Sincerely > > Ivan > > > > On Nov 24, 2011, at 18:30 , landong zuo wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have been looking around for a "recommended" solution to render Named > Graph in XHTML+RDFa syntax but with no luck. > > I am not sure if this is the right place to raise this question. Or, if > this issue was already concluded previously in RDFa Work Group. I am sorry > if it was. > > > > My use case originates from the Trust and Provenance of Semantic Data > Publishing. In such a case, we need to publish the RDF triples alongside > with its metadata, e.g. provenance and digital signature. > > This can be done in TriG syntax by identifying the named graph and > specifying the relationship between graphs. However, if we want to render > the triples in XHTML+RDFa page, there is not a straight way to represent > the named graphs in RDFa syntax. > > > > I've caught up with previous discussion between Mark Birbeck and Michael > Hausenblas at the link below. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Dec/0114.html > > > > As Mark made his point that RDFa is supposed to carry all triples from > single RDF graph and there is not need to put Named Graph in RDFa syntax. I > am wondering if this assumption has somehow restricted the expressivity of > RDFa, i.e. metadata with strong coherent relationship can not be published > within the same page of the document? > > > > I am looking forward to your comment and suggestion. Further discussion > and information is warmly welcomed. > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Landong Zuo > > > > Semantic Web Developer > > > > The Stationery Office > > > > Tel: 44 (0) 1603 696920 > > > > Mobile: +44 (0) 7702192131 > > > > Email: landong.zuo@tso.co.uk > > > > Web: www.tso.co.uk > > > > Orders: www.tsoshop.co.uk > > > > > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 28 November 2011 11:19:53 UTC