- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:30:03 +0100
- To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
On Nov 16, 2011, at 16:23 , Ivan Herman wrote: > Manu is at a conference, so we agreed I would propose an agenda for our telco tomorrow, that I will also chair. > > We have what I believe are relatively low hanging fruits, ie, issues where we seem to have agreement on (based on the email discussion) and it would be good to have them out of the way. Actually, we may want to speed up things by making an informal vote on these before the meeting... My vote: > - ISSUE-97: Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5 > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/97 Yes. As discussed, at the minimum date, time, and datetime syntax (maybe gYear and gDay?) should be recognized and datatype set; if it does not match, it is a plain literal. In the absence of @content the element's text content should be used > > - ISSUE-113: Add the value attribute of the HTML data element as a possible literal target for property > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/113 Yes > > - ISSUE-116: Consider owl terms for vocab expansion > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/116 Yes > > - ISSUE-118: Should we consider allowing the '/' character in a term > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/118 Yes Ivan > We can then look at some of the more 'hairy' issues if we have time. > > Thursday,2011-11-17 > Time: 1400 UTC, 7am San Francisco, 10am Boston, 2pm London, 3pm Amsterdam > W3C Zakim bridge, telecon code: RDFA (7332) > SIP: zakim@voip.w3.org > Phone US: +1.617.761.6200 > irc://irc.w3.org:6665/#rdfa > Duration: 60 minutes > Scribe: Henri, Steven, Gregg, Ted > Chair: Ivan > > Agenda > > 1. Admin: accept last meeting's minutes > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2011-11-03 > > 2. Low hanging fruits on the issue list: > - ISSUE-97: Determine if datetime should be supported in HTML5 > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/97 > > - ISSUE-113: Add the value attribute of the HTML data element as a possible literal target for property > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/113 > > - ISSUE-116: Consider owl terms for vocab expansion > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/116 > > - ISSUE-118: Should we consider allowing the '/' character in a term > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/118 > > 3. ISSUE-108: Refine/deprecate Link relations for the RDFa 1.1 Default Profile > http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/108 > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 15:27:33 UTC