- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 23:11:26 +0000
- To: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi, I noticed in the minutes of your meeting today that you talked a bit about symmetry between @rel and @property. I did a write-up showing parallel microformats, microdata and RDFa markup recently [1] and without even trying (I didn't pick this case specifically, just selected an example from schema.org randomly) came up against the unwanted chaining issue that Michael Steidl raised last month [2]. The example was to create [ a schema:Event ; schema:url <nba-miami-philidelphia-game3.html> ; schema:name " Miami Heat at Philadelphia 76ers - Game 3 (Home Game 1) " ; ] with markup like: <div about="_:event" vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="Event"> <a rel="url" href="nba-miami-philidelphia-game3.html"> <span about="_:event"> NBA Eastern Conference First Round Playoff Tickets: <span property="name"> Miami Heat at Philadelphia 76ers - Game 3 (Home Game 1) </span> </span> </a> ... </div> Note the use of the blank node named _:event in order to bypass the unwanted chaining; I couldn't think of another way of doing it without repeating content (does anyone else have another suggestion?). So I'm really pleased to see the adoption of @property *without* chaining, which allows this to be rewritten as: <div vocab="http://schema.org/" typeof="Event"> <a property="url" href="nba-miami-philidelphia-game3.html"> NBA Eastern Conference First Round Playoff Tickets: <span property="name"> Miami Heat at Philadelphia 76ers - Game 3 (Home Game 1) </span> </a> ... </div> This is a plea to not to make @property always chain: not chaining is useful, and it is a good thing to give a publisher an easy way to do it. I also support not changing @rel behaviour, both for backwards-compatibility reasons and because although it's useful to have non-chaining behaviour, it is *also* useful sometimes to have chaining. I don't think the lack of symmetry is a problem if you think of @rel as an advanced variant of normal @property behaviour rather than them being synonyms. Cheers, Jeni [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/Mixing_HTML_Data_Formats#Mixing_Syntaxes [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2011Oct/0018.html -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 23:11:53 UTC