public-rdf-wg@w3.org from March 2013 by date

Sunday, 31 March 2013

• Re: ADMIN: FPWDs for Semantics/TriG/N-Triples/N-Quads Pat Hayes

Saturday, 30 March 2013

• Node.js tool for RDFa -> JSON-LD transformation Manu Sporny

Friday, 29 March 2013

• Re: [All] Agenda for 3 April 2013 Andy Seaborne
• Re: second review of json-ld Andy Seaborne
• RE: second review of json-ld Markus Lanthaler
• Re: second review of json-ld Gregg Kellogg
• Re: [All] Agenda for 3 April 2013 David Wood
• Re: [All] Agenda for 3 April 2013 Sandro Hawke
• [All] Agenda for 3 April 2013 David Wood
• second review of json-ld Sandro Hawke
• Re: JSON-LD skipping CR? Sandro Hawke
• Re: JSON-LD skipping CR? Ivan Herman
• RE: json-ld shortname now active Markus Lanthaler
• json-ld shortname now active Sandro Hawke
• HTML5/DOM4 normative dependencies… Ivan Herman
• Re: Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) Ivan Herman
• RE: Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) Ivan Herman
• RE: JSON-LD skipping CR? Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: sandro's review of json-ld-api Markus Lanthaler
• Re: JSON-LD skipping CR? Andy Seaborne
• Normative reference to concepts 2004 in Turtle? Ivan Herman
• Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) Ivan Herman
• sandro's review of json-ld-api Sandro Hawke
• JSON-LD skipping CR? Sandro Hawke

Thursday, 28 March 2013

• Final Community Group IP commitments for JSON-LD 1.0 Manu Sporny
• Re: ADMIN: FPWDs for Semantics/TriG/N-Triples/N-Quads Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• ADMIN: FPWDs for Semantics/TriG/N-Triples/N-Quads Guus Schreiber
• Re: admin: references to our own documents Richard Cyganiak
• admin: references to our own documents Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF Semantics references (partly) fixed Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF Semantics references (partly) fixed Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 27 March 2013

• Re: RDF Semantics references (partly) fixed Richard Cyganiak
• Re: minutes problem Arnaud Le Hors
• RE: JSON-LD 1.0 and JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API LC docs ready Markus Lanthaler
• Fwd: Transition Request to FPWD for RDF Semantics / TriG / N-Triples / N-Quads Guus Schreiber
• RDF Semantics references (partly) fixed Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Turtle Patent Policy Signoffs Ivan Herman
• minutes problem Guus Schreiber
• Turtle Patent Policy Signoffs David Wood
• editorial changes to RDF Semantics document Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• JSON-LD 1.0 and JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API LC docs ready Manu Sporny
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar Andy Seaborne
• Re: Regrets for tomorrow's telecon Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar Andy Seaborne
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar Andy Seaborne
• FPWD request for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Guus Schreiber
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Guus Schreiber
• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) Souripriya Das
• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Intent to close ISSUE-224 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) Andy Seaborne
• Intent to close ISSUE-233 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar Andy Seaborne
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar Andy Seaborne
• Regrets for tomorrow's telecon Alan Wu
• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) Gregg Kellogg
• agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) Guus Schreiber

Tuesday, 26 March 2013

• tightenting up the Turtle grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux
• agenda to be posted in a few hours Guus Schreiber
• Intent to close ISSUE-217 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: normalize bnode labels in Turtle tests? Andy Seaborne
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-03-26 Manu Sporny
• Intent to close ISSUE-232 Markus Lanthaler
• Intent to close ISSUE-220 Markus Lanthaler
• normalize bnode labels in Turtle tests? Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Intent to close ISSUE-231 Markus Lanthaler

Monday, 25 March 2013

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 26th 2013 Gregg Kellogg
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 26th 2013 Manu Sporny
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] Eric Prud'hommeaux

Sunday, 24 March 2013

• Update consolidated EARL report for Turtle, and new provisional report for N-Triples Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] Gregg Kellogg
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] Andy Seaborne
• RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 22 March 2013

• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Ivan Herman
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) David Wood
• RE: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Gavin Carothers
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Ivan Herman
• RE: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Ivan Herman
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Ivan Herman
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) David Wood
• Fwd: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Eric Prud'hommeaux

Thursday, 21 March 2013

• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Gregg Kellogg
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Andy Seaborne
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Eric Prud'hommeaux

Wednesday, 20 March 2013

• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Gavin Carothers
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Andy Seaborne
• Intent to close ISSUE-230 Markus Lanthaler
• Minutes for 20-Mar-2013 Gregg Kellogg
• minutes 20 Mar telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Typo in Turtle spec Markus Lanthaler
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Andy Seaborne
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Andy Seaborne
• claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem. Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

• Re: Agenda for 20 March 2013 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: json-ld-syntax review, part 2 Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Agenda for 20 March 2013 Andy Seaborne
• Agenda for 20 March 2013 David Wood
• A new, hopefully more consensual, proposal for bscopes (Was: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem.) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem. Antoine Zimmermann
• Intent to close ISSUE-226 Markus Lanthaler
• RE: More review of JSON-LD syntax Markus Lanthaler
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-03-19 Manu Sporny
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-03-12 Manu Sporny

Monday, 18 March 2013

• Re: More review of JSON-LD syntax Charles Greer
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Andy Seaborne
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Gregg Kellogg
• Re: scope review and an altenative phrasing. Charles Greer
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Andy Seaborne
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Charles Greer
• Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Thomas Baker
• Comment on N-triples and N-Quads Pat Hayes
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML Gavin Carothers
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Gavin Carothers
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Gavin Carothers
• RE: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Andy Seaborne
• Turtle in HTML Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Markus Lanthaler
• RE: JSON-LD in HTML Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads David Wood
• A few comments on N-Triples and N-Quads docs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Ivan Herman
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Andy Seaborne
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Pat Hayes
• Re: scope review and an altenative phrasing. Pat Hayes

Sunday, 17 March 2013

• Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Guus Schreiber
• Re: Review of RDF 1.1 Semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: scope review and an altenative phrasing. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 12th 2013 Manu Sporny
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML Ivan Herman
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML Andy Seaborne
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML Gregg Kellogg
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML Gregg Kellogg
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML Manu Sporny
• RDF-ISSUE-122 (cross-document scopes): bnode scopes in multi-part dataset documents [RDF General] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RE: JSON-LD in HTML Markus Lanthaler
• Another way to do it (was: Re: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem.) Pat Hayes
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML Ivan Herman
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML Ivan Herman

Saturday, 16 March 2013

• JSON-LD in HTML Gregg Kellogg

Sunday, 17 March 2013

• Re: JSON-LD in HTML Gavin Carothers

Saturday, 16 March 2013

• JSON-LD in HTML Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem. Ivan Herman

Friday, 15 March 2013

• Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem. Pat Hayes
• scope review and an altenative phrasing. Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Re: In defence of mathematical notations (Was: Re: blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March) Pat Hayes

Thursday, 14 March 2013

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] Antoine Zimmermann
• In defence of mathematical notations (Was: Re: blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-121 (merge-is-union): Should the merge of two RDF graphs be defined as their set union? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• RE: [json-ld.org] Charles Greer's JSON-LD syntax spec review (#230) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] Pat Hayes
• Review of RDF 1.1 Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: More review of JSON-LD syntax Markus Lanthaler
• RDF-ISSUE-121 (merge-is-union): Should the merge of two RDF graphs be defined as their set union? [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] RDF Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March Pat Hayes

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

• RE: More review of JSON-LD syntax Markus Lanthaler
• More review of JSON-LD syntax Charles Greer
• Re: N-Triples test suite Gregg Kellogg
• Re: N-Triples test suite Andy Seaborne
• RE: [json-ld.org] Sandro Hawke's JSON-LD syntax spec review (#224) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: N-Triples test suite Gregg Kellogg
• Re: blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March Antoine Zimmermann
• minutes 13 Mar telecon Guus Schreiber
• blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: N-Triples test suite Gregg Kellogg
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: N-Triples test suite Andy Seaborne
• Re: N-Triples test suite Gavin Carothers
• Re: RDF 1.1 Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier Guus Schreiber
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier Pat Hayes
• Re: N-Triples test suite Andy Seaborne
• RDF 1.1 Semantics Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier Ivan Herman
• respecful semantics Pat Hayes
• N-Triples test suite Gregg Kellogg

Tuesday, 12 March 2013

• agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier Guus Schreiber
• JSON-LD git repo being released into public domain under CC0 Manu Sporny
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax Markus Lanthaler
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Intent to close ISSUE-221 Gregg Kellogg

Monday, 11 March 2013

• RE: Intent to close ISSUE-221 Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Intent to close ISSUE-221 Andy Seaborne
• Intent to close ISSUE-221 Markus Lanthaler

Sunday, 10 March 2013

• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 12th 2013 Markus Lanthaler
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 12th 2013 Manu Sporny
• Re: Possible FPWDs for TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Antoine Zimmermann
• Possible FPWDs for TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads Gavin Carothers

Saturday, 9 March 2013

• RE: where json-ld is discussed, was Re: review of json-ld-syntax Markus Lanthaler
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax Markus Lanthaler
• Re: html editing oddity Pat Hayes
• Re: html editing oddity Ivan Herman
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Pat Hayes
• html editing oddity Pat Hayes

Friday, 8 March 2013

• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Antoine Zimmermann
• where json-ld is discussed, was Re: review of json-ld-syntax Sandro Hawke
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Pat Hayes
• Re: review of json-ld-syntax Andy Seaborne
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Peter Patel-Schneider
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax Markus Lanthaler
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Pat Hayes
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Pat Hayes
• Re: review of json-ld-syntax Andy Seaborne
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Pat Hayes
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax Markus Lanthaler
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Antoine Zimmermann

Thursday, 7 March 2013

• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Pat Hayes
• Re: semantic extension Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED Pat Hayes
• Re: semantic extension Pat Hayes
• Re: changes to be made to 5 Mar version of Semantics Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: semantic extension Pat Hayes
• Re: reopen ISSUE-97 and reclose next week - should interpretations be relative to a vocabulary Pat Hayes
• Re: changes to be made to 5 Mar version of Semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: semantic extension Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: reopen ISSUE-97 and reclose next week - should interpretations be relative to a vocabulary Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: semantic extension Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: review of json-ld-syntax Gregg Kellogg
• mergeg in current Semantics ED Antoine Zimmermann
• minor edit for Concpets. Pat Hayes
• semantic extension Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: reopen ISSUE-97 and reclose next week - should interpretations be relative to a vocabulary Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: review of json-ld-syntax Andy Seaborne
• Re: Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon Steve Harris
• Sandro's feedback Markus Lanthaler
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax Markus Lanthaler

Wednesday, 6 March 2013

• changes to be made to 5 Mar version of Semantics Peter Patel-Schneider
• committing to the Mercury repository Peter Patel-Schneider
• reopen ISSUE-97 and reclose next week - should interpretations be relative to a vocabulary Peter Patel-Schneider
• Intent to close ISSUE-142 Markus Lanthaler
• Minutes of 06 March 2013 RDF-WG Teleconference Richard Cyganiak
• Re: agenda 7 Mar telecon Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon Ivan Herman
• RE: I hate version control. Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon Pat Hayes
• Re: Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon Pat Hayes
• I hate version control. Pat Hayes
• Re: RDF semantics draft revision Pat Hayes

Tuesday, 5 March 2013

• Re: RDF semantics draft revision Antoine Zimmermann
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-03-05 Manu Sporny
• Re: agenda 7 Mar telecon Andy Seaborne
• Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon Guus Schreiber
• agenda 7 Mar telecon Guus Schreiber
• json-ld-syntax review, part 2 Sandro Hawke
• Chaos ahead (for Europeans): DST starts the coming week-end in the US Ivan Herman
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax Markus Lanthaler
• review of json-ld-syntax Sandro Hawke
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 5th 2013 Manu Sporny

Monday, 4 March 2013

• Turtle CR Grammar (minor) Andy Seaborne

Friday, 1 March 2013

• Re: New draft of Semantics available. Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: New draft of Semantics available. Pat Hayes
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. David Wood
• Re: RDF semantics draft revision Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization Steve Harris
• RDF semantics draft revision Pat Hayes
• Re: New draft of Semantics available. Peter Patel-Schneider
• Re: New draft of Semantics available. (was: Re: Mercurial, I quit.) Ivan Herman
• New draft of Semantics available. (was: Re: Mercurial, I quit.) Pat Hayes
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. Pat Hayes
• Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. Ivan Herman
• Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization Steve Harris
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. Pierre-Antoine Champin
• RE: Mercurial, I quit. Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. David Wood
• Mercurial, I quit. Pat Hayes

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2013 16:36:04 UTC