- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:45:56 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I was looking at the document: http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/ And I realized that almost the normative parts in the document are Appendix A, B, C, and E. Which is fine with me. However, Appendix C (Relationship to RDF) refers to RDF11-CONCEPTS non-normatively which I do not think is right. It also refers to RDF-SCHEMA which should, at some point, be changed to RDF11-SCHEMA as a normative reference. RDF11-CONCEPTS is also referenced from appendix E and again, it should be normative. Bottom line: I believe JSON-LD should normatively refer to RDF11 CONCEPTS and the upcoming 1.1 version of RDF Schemas. That, however, does not make it possible to turn it into a PR before the other documents are at least in CR. We can, of course, skip CR for JSON-LD and leave it on hold as a LC, but that would not buy us any time. (Although it would make it easier to process because we would have one admin hurdle with a transition call less.) Ivan On Mar 29, 2013, at 04:45 , Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > Have we talked about the possibility of skipping CR for JSON-LD? > > It has a lot of implementations and a test suite; if the implementations have passed the test suite by the end of LC, then CR isn't necessary. > > If this is a possibility, we should be sure to point this out in the SOTD -- making it both LC and a "Call for Implementations". For example, see: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-sparql11-query-20120724/ > > Just a thought. > > -- Sandro > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 29 March 2013 10:46:20 UTC