- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:50:45 +0100
- To: "'Sandro Hawke'" <sandro@w3.org>, "'Andy Seaborne'" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 12:47 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > I guess the big question is where LC comments will be tracked. W3C > tracker is horrible for that. W3C lc-tracker is okay. Maybe we can > figure out a way to use git for that that's acceptable for W3C. > (Like, is there at least a data-export function?) Yes, you can export everything easily in JSON - unfortunately not JSON-LD yet :-) List of all open issues: https://api.github.com/repos/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues Closed issues: https://api.github.com/repos/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues?state=closed Details for a specific issue (ISSUE-224 in this case): https://api.github.com/repos/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/224 .. and the corresponding comments: https://api.github.com/repos/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/224/comments I see more and more people using GitHub for spec work these days.. e.g., the HTTP2 spec https://github.com/http2/http2-spec since most developers already have an account there. Not sure what the W3C requirements are. Maybe we could allow people to either send a mail to rdf-comments or let them directly open an issue on GitHub!? Just to give all of you brief overall status update. The syntax spec is complete now, I just wanted to let the rest of the JSON-LD CG have a look at the reverse properties section before I announce it to the whole RDF WG. I allocated most of the coming week to complete the work on the API + Algorithms spec. Cheers, Markus -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Saturday, 9 March 2013 18:51:27 UTC