W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2013

RE: where json-ld is discussed, was Re: review of json-ld-syntax

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:50:45 +0100
To: "'Sandro Hawke'" <sandro@w3.org>, "'Andy Seaborne'" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002c01ce1cf7$032f1480$098d3d80$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 12:47 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:

> I guess the big question is where LC comments will be tracked. W3C
> tracker is horrible for that.  W3C lc-tracker is okay.  Maybe we can
> figure out a way to use git for that that's acceptable for W3C.
> (Like, is there at least a data-export function?)

Yes, you can export everything easily in JSON - unfortunately not JSON-LD
yet :-)

List of all open issues:

Closed issues:

Details for a specific issue (ISSUE-224 in this case):

.. and the corresponding comments:

I see more and more people using GitHub for spec work these days.. e.g., the
HTTP2 spec https://github.com/http2/http2-spec since most developers already
have an account there. Not sure what the W3C requirements are. Maybe we
could allow people to either send a mail to rdf-comments or let them
directly open an issue on GitHub!?

Just to give all of you brief overall status update. The syntax spec is
complete now, I just wanted to let the rest of the JSON-LD CG have a look at
the reverse properties section before I announce it to the whole RDF WG. I
allocated most of the coming week to complete the work on the API +
Algorithms spec.


Markus Lanthaler
Received on Saturday, 9 March 2013 18:51:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:26 UTC