W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite"

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:31:26 +0000
Message-ID: <51498FFE.9030500@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 20/03/13 07:12, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> I pushed the ~100 atomic tests into the test-ttl test suite.
>
> huh, i thought the action was on me until i checked tracker.

Eric,

I'm getting some warnings from use of:

<http://a.example/AZaz\u00c0\u00d6\u00d8\u00f6\u00f8\u02ff\u0370\u037d\u037f\u1fff\u200c\u200d\u2070\u218f\u2c00\u2fef\u3001\ud7ff\uf900\ufdcf\ufdf0\ufffd\U00010000\U000effff>

as not being Normal Form KC and not Normal Form C (presumably different 
characters causing those two warnings).

(it's not related to the \U characters - I tried without them as well.)

I'm not clear what RDF Concept says here.  It's directly stating 
literals are NFC, but any impact on IRIs comes indirectly from "it's a 
legal IRI"

RFC 3987:
[[ 3.1.  Mapping of IRIs to URIs

             c. If the IRI is in a Unicode-based character encoding (for
                example, UTF-8 or UTF-16), do not normalize (see section
                5.3.2.2 for details).  Apply step 2 directly to the
                encoded Unicode character sequence.
]]

5.3.2.2 says:
[[
To avoid false negatives and problems with
    transcoding, IRIs SHOULD be created by using NFC.
]]

so it's a SHOULD in RFC 3987 on creation.


	Andy


>
> I think we should quickly change the
>    @prefix rdft:   <http://www.w3.org/ns/rdftest#> .
> namespace to
>    <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl/ns>
> as it is entirely Turtle-specific (used for the following types:
>    rdft:TestTurtleEval
>    rdft:TestTurtlePositiveSyntax
>    rdft:TestTurtleNegativeSyntax
>    rdft:TestTurtleNegativeEval
>
> ). I expect that the general notion of an RDF manifest-driven test
> suite will some day use <http://www.w3.org/ns/rdftest#> but would look
> like <http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/test-manifest#> .
>
> While curating the CR comments, I saw that 21 proposes some additional tests.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Turtle_Candidate_Recommendation_Comments#c21
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:32:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:26 UTC