- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:54:08 -0700
- To: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Cc: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Mar 14, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr> wrote: > This is a review of RDF 1.1 Semantics Editor's draft, but I'm not completely sure if everything applies to the current version. I tried to keep my review up to date with the ongoing changes, but I mostly worked on a printed version from last week. > > As I said, all issues except bnode scope are relatively small and should not block publication as FPWD. > > […] > > > Issues with Literals and datatypes: > ================================== > The definition of datatype does not match the definition in Concepts, but most importantly, it does not match the normative definition of XSD that we cannot change. More specifically, XSD defines the L2V mapping as a total function going from the lexical space to the value space. I don't see this as a problem, as I don't see why RDF datatypes have to be XSD datatypes. As well, I don't think that there has been any change in this respect. […] peter
Received on Sunday, 17 March 2013 20:54:40 UTC