public-rdf-wg@w3.org from March 2013 by author

Alan Wu

• Regrets for tomorrow's telecon (Wednesday, 27 March)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: [All] Agenda for 3 April 2013 (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: second review of json-ld (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: JSON-LD skipping CR? (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: normalize bnode labels in Turtle tests? (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: Agenda for 20 March 2013 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• A few comments on N-Triples and N-Quads docs (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: N-Triples test suite (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: N-Triples test suite (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: N-Triples test suite (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: Intent to close ISSUE-221 (Monday, 11 March)
• Re: review of json-ld-syntax (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: review of json-ld-syntax (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: review of json-ld-syntax (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: agenda 7 Mar telecon (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Turtle CR Grammar (minor) (Monday, 4 March)

Antoine Zimmermann

• A new, hopefully more consensual, proposal for bscopes (Was: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem.) (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem. (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 14 March)
• In defence of mathematical notations (Was: Re: blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March) (Thursday, 14 March)
• Review of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RDF 1.1 Semantics (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: Possible FPWDs for TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Sunday, 10 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: semantic extension (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: semantic extension (Thursday, 7 March)
• mergeg in current Semantics ED (Thursday, 7 March)
• semantic extension (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: reopen ISSUE-97 and reclose next week - should interpretations be relative to a vocabulary (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: RDF semantics draft revision (Tuesday, 5 March)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: minutes problem (Wednesday, 27 March)

Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)

• Re: Regrets for tomorrow's telecon (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: agenda 7 Mar telecon (Wednesday, 6 March)

Charles Greer

• Re: More review of JSON-LD syntax (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: scope review and an altenative phrasing. (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• More review of JSON-LD syntax (Wednesday, 13 March)

David Wood

• Re: [All] Agenda for 3 April 2013 (Friday, 29 March)
• [All] Agenda for 3 April 2013 (Friday, 29 March)
• Turtle Patent Policy Signoffs (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Agenda for 20 March 2013 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar (Wednesday, 27 March)
• tightenting up the Turtle grammar (Tuesday, 26 March)
• normalize bnode labels in Turtle tests? (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Thursday, 21 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Wednesday, 20 March)
• claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Wednesday, 20 March)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: N-Triples test suite (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Possible FPWDs for TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Sunday, 10 March)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: second review of json-ld (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] (Monday, 25 March)
• Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 26th 2013 (Monday, 25 March)
• Update consolidated EARL report for Turtle, and new provisional report for N-Triples (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] (Sunday, 24 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Fwd: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: claimed completion on "ACTION-233: Publish the consolidated test suite" (Thursday, 21 March)
• Minutes for 20-Mar-2013 (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Re: json-ld-syntax review, part 2 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML (Sunday, 17 March)
• JSON-LD in HTML (Saturday, 16 March)
• JSON-LD in HTML (Saturday, 16 March)
• Re: N-Triples test suite (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: N-Triples test suite (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: N-Triples test suite (Wednesday, 13 March)
• N-Triples test suite (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: Intent to close ISSUE-221 (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Re: review of json-ld-syntax (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)

Guus Schreiber

• ADMIN: FPWDs for Semantics/TriG/N-Triples/N-Quads (Thursday, 28 March)
• admin: references to our own documents (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics references (partly) fixed (Thursday, 28 March)
• Fwd: Transition Request to FPWD for RDF Semantics / TriG / N-Triples / N-Quads (Wednesday, 27 March)
• minutes problem (Wednesday, 27 March)
• FPWD request for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Wednesday, 27 March)
• agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• agenda to be posted in a few hours (Tuesday, 26 March)
• minutes 20 Mar telecon (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Sunday, 17 March)
• minutes 13 Mar telecon (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier (Wednesday, 13 March)
• agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon (Tuesday, 5 March)
• agenda 7 Mar telecon (Tuesday, 5 March)

Ivan Herman

• Re: JSON-LD skipping CR? (Friday, 29 March)
• HTML5/DOM4 normative dependencies… (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) (Friday, 29 March)
• Normative reference to concepts 2004 in Turtle? (Friday, 29 March)
• Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: Turtle Patent Policy Signoffs (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem. (Saturday, 16 March)
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: html editing oddity (Saturday, 9 March)
• Re: Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Chaos ahead (for Europeans): DST starts the coming week-end in the US (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Re: New draft of Semantics available. (was: Re: Mercurial, I quit.) (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)

Manu Sporny

• Node.js tool for RDFa -> JSON-LD transformation (Saturday, 30 March)
• Final Community Group IP commitments for JSON-LD 1.0 (Thursday, 28 March)
• JSON-LD 1.0 and JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API LC docs ready (Wednesday, 27 March)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-03-26 (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 26th 2013 (Monday, 25 March)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-03-19 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-03-12 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 12th 2013 (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: JSON-LD in HTML (Sunday, 17 March)
• JSON-LD git repo being released into public domain under CC0 (Tuesday, 12 March)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 12th 2013 (Sunday, 10 March)
• JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2013-03-05 (Tuesday, 5 March)
• Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 5th 2013 (Tuesday, 5 March)

Markus Lanthaler

• RE: second review of json-ld (Friday, 29 March)
• RE: json-ld shortname now active (Friday, 29 March)
• RE: Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) (Friday, 29 March)
• RE: JSON-LD skipping CR? (Friday, 29 March)
• RE: Normative vs. non-normative in JSON-LD (Re: JSON-LD skipping CR?) (Friday, 29 March)
• RE: sandro's review of json-ld-api (Friday, 29 March)
• RE: JSON-LD 1.0 and JSON-LD 1.0 Algorithms and API LC docs ready (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-224 (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-233 (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-217 (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-232 (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-220 (Tuesday, 26 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-231 (Tuesday, 26 March)
• RE: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• RE: [json-ld.org] JSON-LD in HTML (#231) (Friday, 22 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-230 (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Typo in Turtle spec (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-226 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• RE: More review of JSON-LD syntax (Tuesday, 19 March)
• RE: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Turtle in HTML (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: JSON-LD in HTML (Monday, 18 March)
• RE: JSON-LD in HTML (Sunday, 17 March)
• RE: [json-ld.org] Charles Greer's JSON-LD syntax spec review (#230) (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: More review of JSON-LD syntax (Thursday, 14 March)
• RE: More review of JSON-LD syntax (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RE: [json-ld.org] Sandro Hawke's JSON-LD syntax spec review (#224) (Wednesday, 13 March)
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax (Tuesday, 12 March)
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax (Tuesday, 12 March)
• RE: Intent to close ISSUE-221 (Monday, 11 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-221 (Monday, 11 March)
• RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, March 12th 2013 (Sunday, 10 March)
• RE: where json-ld is discussed, was Re: review of json-ld-syntax (Saturday, 9 March)
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax (Saturday, 9 March)
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax (Friday, 8 March)
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax (Friday, 8 March)
• Sandro's feedback (Thursday, 7 March)
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax (Thursday, 7 March)
• Intent to close ISSUE-142 (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: I hate version control. (Wednesday, 6 March)
• RE: review of json-ld-syntax (Tuesday, 5 March)
• RE: Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)

Pat Hayes

• Re: ADMIN: FPWDs for Semantics/TriG/N-Triples/N-Quads (Sunday, 31 March)
• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem. (Wednesday, 20 March)
• Semantics (Monday, 18 March)
• Comment on N-triples and N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)
• Re: scope review and an altenative phrasing. (Monday, 18 March)
• Another way to do it (was: Re: Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem.) (Sunday, 17 March)
• Three alternative approaches for fixing the blank node scope problem. (Friday, 15 March)
• scope review and an altenative phrasing. (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: In defence of mathematical notations (Was: Re: blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March) (Friday, 15 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-121 (merge-is-union): Should the merge of two RDF graphs be defined as their set union? [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: RDF 1.1 Semantics (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier (Wednesday, 13 March)
• respecful semantics (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: html editing oddity (Saturday, 9 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Saturday, 9 March)
• html editing oddity (Saturday, 9 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: semantic extension (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: semantic extension (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: reopen ISSUE-97 and reclose next week - should interpretations be relative to a vocabulary (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: changes to be made to 5 Mar version of Semantics (Thursday, 7 March)
• minor edit for Concpets. (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon (Wednesday, 6 March)
• I hate version control. (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: RDF semantics draft revision (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: New draft of Semantics available. (Friday, 1 March)
• RDF semantics draft revision (Friday, 1 March)
• New draft of Semantics available. (was: Re: Mercurial, I quit.) (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)
• Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: ADMIN: FPWDs for Semantics/TriG/N-Triples/N-Quads (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics references (partly) fixed (Thursday, 28 March)
• RDF Semantics references (partly) fixed (Wednesday, 27 March)
• editorial changes to RDF Semantics document (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Agenda for 20 March 2013 (Tuesday, 19 March)
• Re: Review of RDF 1.1 Semantics (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: scope review and an altenative phrasing. (Sunday, 17 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)

Peter Patel-Schneider

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 14 March)
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 14 March)
• blank node scope - ISSUE-107 - resolve as in Semantics - hopefully on 20 March (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: agenda 13 Mar telecon (incomplete) NOTE for Europeans: 1 hour earlier (Wednesday, 13 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Friday, 8 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: mergeg in current Semantics ED (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: changes to be made to 5 Mar version of Semantics (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: reopen ISSUE-97 and reclose next week - should interpretations be relative to a vocabulary (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: semantic extension (Thursday, 7 March)
• changes to be made to 5 Mar version of Semantics (Wednesday, 6 March)
• committing to the Mercury repository (Wednesday, 6 March)
• reopen ISSUE-97 and reclose next week - should interpretations be relative to a vocabulary (Wednesday, 6 March)
• Re: New draft of Semantics available. (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: RDF semantics draft revision (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: New draft of Semantics available. (Friday, 1 March)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Re: Mercurial, I quit. (Friday, 1 March)

RDF Working Group Issue Tracker

• RDF-ISSUE-123 (localName chars): PN_CHARS_BASE permits up to U+EFFFF but RFC-3987 stops at U+EFFFD [RDF Turtle] (Sunday, 24 March)
• RDF-ISSUE-122 (cross-document scopes): bnode scopes in multi-part dataset documents [RDF General] (Sunday, 17 March)
• RDF-ISSUE-121 (merge-is-union): Should the merge of two RDF graphs be defined as their set union? [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 14 March)
• RDF-ISSUE-120 (set-of-triples-are-graphs): Is any set of RDF triples an RDF graph? [RDF Concepts] (Thursday, 14 March)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: admin: references to our own documents (Thursday, 28 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics references (partly) fixed (Wednesday, 27 March)
• Minutes of 06 March 2013 RDF-WG Teleconference (Wednesday, 6 March)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: [All] Agenda for 3 April 2013 (Friday, 29 March)
• second review of json-ld (Friday, 29 March)
• Re: JSON-LD skipping CR? (Friday, 29 March)
• json-ld shortname now active (Friday, 29 March)
• sandro's review of json-ld-api (Friday, 29 March)
• JSON-LD skipping CR? (Friday, 29 March)
• where json-ld is discussed, was Re: review of json-ld-syntax (Friday, 8 March)
• json-ld-syntax review, part 2 (Tuesday, 5 March)
• review of json-ld-syntax (Tuesday, 5 March)

Souripriya Das

• Re: agenda 27 March telecon (for EuropeansL 1 hour earlier) (Wednesday, 27 March)

Steve Harris

• Re: Typo: agenda *6* Mar telecon (Thursday, 7 March)
• Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization (Friday, 1 March)
• Re: Blank Node Identifiers and RDF Dataset Normalization (Friday, 1 March)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: tightenting up the Turtle grammar (Wednesday, 27 March)

Thomas Baker

• Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads (Monday, 18 March)

Last message date: Sunday, 31 March 2013 16:36:04 UTC