W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Call for Consensus: FPWD for Semantics, TriG, N-Triples, N-Quads

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:52:59 +0000
Message-ID: <5147385B.1080009@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org


On 18/03/13 15:35, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> I'm fine with publishing them as FPWD. However, I'm not convinced that
> standardizing these variations or conventions as separate formats is a good
> idea. An alternative would be to add a profile media type parameter to
> Turtle (which should still be possible because it would be optional) and
> TriG.
>
> So, an N-Quads file could be served as follows:
>
> Content-Type: application/trig;
> profile="http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/N-Quad"

N-Quads is not a subset of TriG.

	Andy

>
> We do something similar in JSON-LD to signal/request
> expanded/compacted/flattened documents.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Markus
>
>
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 15:53:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:26 UTC