Monday, 30 November 2020
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: Some reflections on the semantics of embedded triples
- Re: Some reflections on the semantics of embedded triples
- Some reflections on the semantics of embedded triples
- RE: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- "embedded predicate triples"
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
Sunday, 29 November 2020
- Re: RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- RDF* vs RDF vs named graphs
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
- suggestions about "RDF* and SPARQL*" draft
Friday, 27 November 2020
Thursday, 26 November 2020
- Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27
- Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27
- Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27
- Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27
- Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27
- Re: Agenda for 2020-11-27
- Agenda for 2020-11-27
- Evaluation semantics of BGP* and BIND*/FIND added to the draft spec
Wednesday, 25 November 2020
- Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*)
- Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*)
- Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*)
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
- Introduction
Tuesday, 24 November 2020
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
- Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*)
- Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*)
- Re: RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*)
- RDF* to RDF mapping (Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*)
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
Monday, 23 November 2020
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
- Re: First version of a test suite for RDF*
- First version of a test suite for RDF*
Sunday, 22 November 2020
Saturday, 21 November 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
Friday, 20 November 2020
- Re: Agenda for 2020-11-20
- Naming conventions [was: Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)]
Thursday, 19 November 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Agenda for 2020-11-20
- Re: Action point: discussing contra use case against referential opacity
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Action point: discussing contra use case against referential opacity
- RDF Star community home page
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
Wednesday, 18 November 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
Tuesday, 17 November 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
Monday, 16 November 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Referential opacity: current state of affairs
- Re: Minutes of today's call
Saturday, 14 November 2020
- Action point: discussing contra use case against referential opacity
- Re: Minutes of today's call
- Minutes of today's call
Friday, 13 November 2020
- Collecting use case and requirements.
- Re: Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward)
- Re: Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward)
Tuesday, 10 November 2020
Tuesday, 3 November 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward)
Monday, 2 November 2020
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Re: Twice married to the same person problem, was [Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity]
- Re: owl:sameAs/referential opacity Re: Can RDFstar be defined as only syntactic sugar on top of RDF (Re: weakness of embedded triples)
- Weekly call (Re: Moving RDF* forward)